// For title insurance agencies
AI for title companies and title agencies, tested first on commitments your examiners already wrote.
For agencies that search, examine and close as the agent of an underwriter, on commercial and residential files. Start with the paperwork every order begins with: the search package turned into a draft commitment, Schedule A, the B-I requirements and the B-II exceptions, for your examiner to decide. It runs on redacted copies of 20 to 30 closed files, and nothing logs in to your title production system.
- First job
- Commitments drafted from the search package
- You send
- 20 to 30 closed files, redacted, after the NDA
- Access needed
- None: no production system, title plant or escrow account
- Insurability
- Always your licensed examiner's call
- Left out
- Funds, wire instructions and personal data
- Price
- Per job, with a range up front
// Jobs we would test
Work on the title side of the file
Title commitments from the search
The vesting deed, open mortgages, judgments, recorded easements and covenants from the search drafted into Schedule A, B-I and B-II, for your examiner to accept, change or strike line by line.
See the commitments pagePayoffs and lien release tracking
Every lien the commitment says must go, followed from payoff letter to recorded release, with the open ones listed for your post-closing team before the final policy.
See the lien release pageFinal policy production
The marked-up commitment, the recorded documents and the endorsements ordered drafted into the owner's or loan policy, for the examiner to check before it issues and is reported to the underwriter.
Read the final policy pageSurvey review on commercial files
Each easement and covenant on Schedule B checked against the surveyor's notes on an ALTA/NSPS survey, with any mismatch listed before a survey exception comes off.
Read the survey review page// Why commitments first
Every closed file already holds the answer
A closed file carries the whole chain: the search your plant, abstractor or search vendor returned, each revision of the commitment, the copy marked up at closing, and the policy that issued. The commitment your examiner signed off is the answer key. Your reviewer, the examiner who knows your underwriter's guidelines best, sets each AI draft beside it requirement by requirement and exception by exception, and nothing about the test depends on a demo file.
The job sits where your agency's authority sits. ALTA's Best Practices define a title agency as one a title insurer authorizes to issue policies, which may also handle escrow, disburse funds and record documents. The 2021 ALTA commitment draws the same line from the insurer's side: its Condition 7 makes the issuing agent the company's agent only for issuing commitments and policies, not for closing, settlement or escrow. These pages test the title side. The escrow side, with its trust accounts and wires, stays out of every job here.
Forms changed recently enough to matter in a sample. ALTA's 2021 commitment and policies took effect July 1, 2021, and the 2016 commitment and the 2006 owner's and loan policies were decertified at the end of 2022, so older files may sit on forms you no longer issue. Texas agents work on forms the Texas Department of Insurance promulgates, and those split by property type: the T-1R owner's policy for improved one-to-four family homes and the T-1 for everything else, both effective November 1, 2024, like the T-2 loan policy. Your reviewer picks files on today's forms, from the states you write in.
Both kinds of file belong in the test, because they go wrong in different places. A residential refinance repeats the same handful of requirements file after file, and the risk is a judgment against a similar name or a second mortgage nobody asked about. A commercial purchase brings entity sellers, a lender's endorsement list and a land title survey, and the risk is a recorded easement drafted wrong. Final policies come after commitments: ALTA's Best Practices ask for a policy within 30 days of the later of settlement or the day the commitment's terms are met, reported to the underwriter within 45, and both clocks depend on the commitment being right.
Privacy decides what we see. Version 5.0 of ALTA's Best Practices, effective October 8, 2026, turned its seventh pillar into vendor management and asks an agency to weigh whether a vendor will reach nonpublic personal information or funds. Under the framework, NPI means a name joined with a Social Security, driver's license or state ID number, or a card or other financial account number. So copies arrive redacted, under the NDA, and no NPI, bank detail or wire instruction enters the test. The proof of concept never issues or signs a commitment or policy, never decides insurability or whether an exception stays, never handles funds, and never contacts a buyer, seller, lender or underwriter. A licensed person at your agency decides. None of this is legal or underwriting advice.
// How the proof of concept runs
One job, judged by your own examiner
- Step 01
Redacted copies of closed files
After the NDA, your team pulls 20 to 30 closed files for one job: the search and the commitments that came from it, or the payoffs and the releases that followed. We call this the sandbox, a free test of one job on your own files. Nothing logs in to your production system or plant, and files that can't leave the office become look-alikes built with your reviewer.
- Step 02
Your reviewer makes the call
The owner picks the reviewer and signs off on written success criteria first, and you leave the call with a price range for running the job live. Your reviewer scores each draft against what your examiners or post-closing team actually did, and that judgment settles it.
- Step 03
About 30 days on new orders
After a yes, the same job runs on new files for about 30 days. A licensed examiner or your post-closing lead checks every draft before anything is issued, recorded or sent to a lender, a buyer, a seller or your underwriter.
Priced per job: a range before the proof of concept, a fixed price before you sign.
The range comes on the call, once we know roughly how many orders your examiners open each month and how the work splits between residential and commercial files.
// Questions
What title agency owners ask
Which title production system do you need?
Will the AI decide what is insurable?
Do you touch escrow, disbursements or wire instructions?
We write for more than one underwriter. Does that matter?
Do you work on commercial files or residential?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Your issued commitments are the test.
A 30-minute call with Rob Eason. The booking form asks for your agency and role, the job you want tested, and roughly how many orders open each month. Please keep every file with you until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
