// AI for land surveying firms
AI for land surveying firms, tested on survey requests and Schedule B reviews you already finished.
For regional land surveying and geomatics firms working for commercial developers, title companies, utilities and public agencies. Begin with the desk work around a land title survey: turning a request into a proposal scope, or reading a commitment's Schedule B exceptions into a review sheet. Either one becomes a free AI proof of concept, tried on copies of 20 to 30 jobs your office already closed. Your reviewer, whoever in the firm knows that paperwork best, decides whether it held up. A licensed surveyor keeps every determination.
- First job
- ALTA proposal scopes, or Schedule B review sheets
- From you
- 20 to 30 closed jobs, copied after the NDA
- Never touched
- CAD, field data, a live survey or a county filing
- Surveyor only
- Boundaries, plotting calls, seals and fees
- Reviewer
- Named by the owner, usually a project surveyor
- Price
- A range now, a fixed price before signing
// Jobs we would test
Start with the pages that come before the crew goes out
ALTA survey proposal scopes
A client's survey request and the lender's or title company's requirements read into a draft scope: the ALTA/NSPS edition named, Table A items listed by number, access and utility notes, deliverables, and the fields your project surveyor must confirm before quoting.
See the proposal scope pageTitle exception review sheets
Schedule B exceptions and the recorded documents behind them laid out line by line: exception number, instrument reference, whether a copy came with the file, and each entry left open for the surveyor to plot or decide.
See the exception review pagePlat review comment logs
A city's or county's review comments on a plat sorted into one response list by sheet and note, so whoever answers them starts from the same page.
Deed and prior survey indexes
Older deeds, plats and your own past jobs near a new site indexed by parcel and recording reference for the person doing records research.
// Why these two first
The fieldwork stays yours. The desk work has a written answer key.
The standards leave the tools to the profession. ALTA adopted the current land title survey requirements on October 8, 2025, and NSPS followed on October 17. Their FAQ explains why Sections 5 and 6 now defer to whatever practices the profession generally accepts: with drones, LiDAR and AI moving quickly, the joint workgroup chose not to rule on tools one by one. This test stays on the desk side of that question. It reads paper your office has already handled, and nothing about how a crew measures changes.
A precise corner can still be the wrong corner. Section 3 caps relative positional precision at 2 cm plus 50 parts per million, then says that figure is no substitute for boundary law: a tightly measured corner can still sit in the wrong place if boundary law principles were misapplied. Where a line falls is the surveyor's opinion, formed from monuments, record descriptions and possession. So nothing in this proof of concept draws, locates or resolves anything.
States split on who brings the easements. Colorado's plat statute, C.R.S. 38-51-106, calls for all recorded and apparent rights-of-way and easements, with the source named when someone else did the research, or else a statement that the client did not ask for them. Florida's boundary survey rule, 5J-17.052, has easements on applicable record plats and open evidence of others shown, while saying its research duty stops short of a title search. Oklahoma's minimum standards say the location of any easement beyond those on recorded subdivision plats must be furnished to the surveyor if it is wanted. Your closed jobs record how your office handled each state, which is what makes them a fair sample.
Public clients buy in a different order. Texas Government Code section 2254.004 has a governmental entity buying land surveying select the most highly qualified provider on demonstrated competence first, and negotiate a fair and reasonable price only after that. A private client may ask for scope and price in the same email. So a scope sheet for public work records how the buyer is selecting and leaves the fee field empty until your surveyor fills it.
Both jobs arrive with their own key. Every ALTA request you quoted left a client email, a lender or title company list and the proposal you sent. Every commitment you worked left the exception documents and the Schedule B notes on the delivered plat. Your reviewer grades each draft against that record instead of a demo file.
One limit covers every job here. The proof of concept reads copies and drafts. It never touches CAD, field data, a live survey or a county filing. It never determines a boundary, decides whether an exception is plottable, certifies or seals a survey, or sets a fee, and it never contacts a client, title company or agency. A licensed surveyor makes every determination and seals every survey. These summaries of published rules are not legal or surveying advice.
// How the test runs
One desk, three steps
- Step 01
Pick the job, name the reviewer
The owner or a principal picks one job and names the reviewer, often a project surveyor or the person who writes your proposals. Nothing moves until the success criteria are written down, you have a price range for the live job, and the NDA is signed.
- Step 02
Run it on closed jobs
Send copies of 20 to 30 closed jobs: requests and the proposals they became, or commitments, exception documents and delivered plats as PDFs. Inside Massmarket this step is the sandbox, a free AI proof of concept on your own paper. Files that can't leave the office become look-alikes built with your reviewer.
- Step 03
After a yes, about 30 days live
The same job runs on new requests or new commitments for about 30 days. A person approves each item before it reaches a client, a title company or a crew. Any next job waits for that decision and carries its own price.
Priced per job: a range before the proof of concept, a fixed price before you sign.
Rob sets the range on the call from three counts: ALTA requests your office answers in a month, title commitments you review, and the states where you hold licenses.
// Questions
What surveying firm owners ask
Does this touch our CAD files or field data?
Will the AI decide what can be plotted?
We are licensed in several states. Does that change the test?
Can we test this on public agency work?
Which survey or project software do you need?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Start from the ALTA jobs you quoted last quarter.
Half an hour with Rob Eason: your firm and your role, the job you'd test first, and roughly how many land title surveys your office quotes in a month. Requests, commitments and plats stay with you until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
