// Safety equipment distributors · Certification requests
Product certification requests, matched to your files and the public listings.
A customer's EHS manager or an auditor sends a list of what you sold them and wants the paper on each item. In a free AI proof of concept, AI works copies of 20 to 30 requests your team already answered and drafts each packet: approval or certification number, standard and edition, the maker's declaration or test summary on hand, and the items with nothing on file. Your reviewer, the person on your team who knows those files best, compares each draft with the packet that went out.
- Requests tested
- 20 to 30, already answered
- Products judged compliant
- None
- Customers contacted
- None
// The one job
From a list of items to a packet a person can check
The request comes from a plant's EHS manager, a contractor's safety director before a job starts, or an auditor working through a sample of what was issued. It lists item numbers or descriptions and asks for proof: the approval, the standard each item meets, the test summary. Someone finds the right document for each line, checks that it covers that item and that edition, and writes back about whatever isn't there.
In the test, AI reads copies of those requests beside your product files and the public listings your team relies on, and drafts the reply line by line: item, approval or certification number, standard and edition, which document is on hand and where it came from. Lines with nothing on file go on a list for a person to chase with the maker. Nothing is sent.
and public listings
// The hard parts
Why a document on file may not answer the question
A NIOSH number is a map. Every approval begins with TC, then a schedule code, then a number NIOSH assigned. A 13F is self-contained breathing apparatus, 19C supplied air, 14G a gas mask with canister, 23C an air-purifying respirator with chemical cartridge, 21C a powered air-purifying respirator with a particulate filter, and 84A a particulate filter, alone or combined with a chemical cartridge. NIOSH approves complete assemblies and issues no certificate for an individual component. The full label is a table of part numbers with an X in each approved configuration, so a request about one cartridge can't be answered without the facepiece it goes on. The draft quotes that row and holds the line when the pairing is missing.
A number that checked out last year may not today. NIOSH says the easiest way to confirm an approval is its Certified Equipment List, which can be searched by approval number. In a March 2025 notice it rescinded four approvals at the holder's request, a self-contained breathing apparatus and a gas mask among them: from March 28 those numbers left the list, and those respirators could no longer be used, made, assembled, sold or distributed. A photocopy in your files won't show that, so the draft records the date each number was checked. Names can mislead too. On a private-labeled product the private label's name appears where the approval holder's would, so the draft matches on the TC number and shows both names when it finds them.
A declaration and a certificate make different promises. ANSI/ISEA 125-2021 sets out three levels. At Level 1 the supplier tests in-house or at a third-party lab. At Level 2 testing happens at a facility accredited to ISO 17025, and the product is made under an ISO 9001-registered quality system. Both end in a supplier's declaration of conformity. At Level 3 the whole process, from testing to surveillance, runs under an accredited certification body. ISEA offers a blank declaration form, calls it the sole responsibility of manufacturers and suppliers, and says it does not keep records of conformity. The draft names which one you hold, and a request for third-party certification answered by a declaration is marked for your reviewer.
The edition is its own field. OSHA's eye rule names ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010, ANSI Z87.1-2003 and ANSI Z87.1-1989 (R-1998), and accepts equipment an employer shows is at least as effective. ISEA announced Z87.1-2025 in January 2026, with clearer, more standardized markings. OSHA's head rule stops at Z89.1-2009, and its foot rule still lists ANSI Z41 editions, a reference withdrawn in 2005 and replaced by ASTM's standards. Alaska Railroad's 2016 bid for prescription safety glasses wrote in the 2010 edition and applied it to both lenses and frames. A request for the current standard and a request that names an edition are different questions, so the draft reports the edition printed on your document and never rounds it up.
Gloves send people back to the maker. OSHA's nonmandatory appendix says that before buying gloves an employer should ask the manufacturer for documentation that they meet the appropriate test standard for the hazard anticipated. So a glove line can bring a request your invoice can't answer. Rubber goods carry markings of their own, a class from 00 through 4 and Type I or ozone-resistant Type II. Your reviewer, usually whoever keeps your certificate files, checks that each document fits the item that shipped, none was stretched to cover a neighbor, and every gap made the chase list.
// What you send
Requests your team already answered
20 to 30 answered requests
Old requests from customers and auditors, each with the packet your team sent back. Include one where an item couldn't be documented and one your team had to answer twice.
The files behind them
Approvals, declarations, test summaries and spec sheets as you keep them, superseded versions included, so the test can tell an old edition from a newer one.
What actually shipped
Order or invoice lines for the items in those requests, so each answer can be tied to the product that went out.
NDA first, nothing linked
The NDA is signed before any file moves. Nobody signs in to your ERP, a maker's portal or a customer's supplier system, and files that have to stay in your building become look-alikes built with your reviewer.
// Before it starts
Settled before the first request is copied
Your company's name goes on these answers, so the owner fixes the terms first.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, usually whoever keeps the certificate files
- Who stands behind each answer
- A named person at your company, in the test and live
- Documents in scope
- Approvals, declarations, certificates, test summaries, or a subset
- Success criteria
- Written and agreed, including how a chase item is scored
- Sample
- Chosen by your reviewer, with respirators, gloves and footwear in it
- Price
- A range for running this job live
// How it's judged
Each draft beside the packet that went out
| On the same 20 to 30 requests | The packet your team sent | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Every item in the request found and carried into the draft | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
| Approval or certification number tied to the item that shipped | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
| Number confirmed against the public listing, with the date checked | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
| Standard and edition taken from the document, not assumed | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
| Declaration, certificate or test summary named for what it is | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
| Respirator assembly matched part by part to the approved row | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
| Items with nothing on file, listed for a person to chase | Scored on your requests | Scored on your requests |
// After a yes
About 30 days on new requests
Once your reviewer says yes against the success criteria, new requests get a drafted packet for about 30 days.
A named person at your company checks every document before it goes out, and anything on the chase list stays with your team until the maker answers.
Another job, if you want one, gets decided and priced separately.
// What could come next
Possible next jobs, in order
- 01Next
PPE program spec quotes
A plant's matrix read into a draft item list, with every row the document leaves open marked for your desk.
- 02Then
Standard change lists
After a standard or an approval changes, the items your customers bought that it touches, drawn from your own sales.
- 03After that
Maker document refresh
Dates on makers' declarations and test summaries listed, with a request drafted for your team when one looks old.
// One hard limit
It never decides that a product is suitable or compliant.
It matches what your files and public listings say and lists what it can't find. The proof of concept never decides what protection a job needs, never says a product is suitable or compliant, never signs or sends a document, never touches your ERP or a live quote, and never contacts a maker, a customer or an auditor. A qualified safety person at your customer decides what the job needs, and a person at your company checks every document before it goes out. Nothing on this page is legal or safety advice.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
What moves the range: requests in a month, items in a typical request, and how your makers' documents are filed.
// Questions
Questions from the documentation desk
Will it tell a customer that a product is compliant?
Does it check NIOSH's Certified Equipment List?
What if a maker's paper names the standard but not the edition?
Is a declaration of conformity the same as a certificate?
Can it handle private-label items?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a call with Rob
Bring the request that sent your team digging.
A 30-minute call with Rob: your company and role, who sends these requests, and about how many reach your team in a month. Hold your product files and customer names until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
