// Rebar fabricators · Placing drawing checks
Placing drawing checks against the structural set, before the sheets go out.
For detailing groups inside rebar fabricators working on commercial buildings, bridges and public works. One job, tested on sets your team already issued. AI compares each placing drawing with the structural drawings and addenda and lists bar marks, spacing, counts and revisions carried or missed, with every conflict written up for your detailer and the engineer. Your reviewer, the detailer who knows this work best, scores each list.
- Past placing sets
- 20 to 30
- Drawings approved
- None
- Conflicts decided
- None, ever
// The one job
A detailed set is ready to issue. A conflict list comes back.
Your detailer builds placing sheets from the structural drawings, the specification and addenda that keep arriving, and a second person checks them before they go for review. That checker traces marks back to schedules, walks bars across pour breaks, confirms spacing and counts, and tries to prove the last addendum made it onto the sheets.
In the test, AI reads copies of sets you already issued, with the structural sheets and addenda in force at that date, and drafts a comparison: every bar mark against the schedule or detail it traces to, the spacing and count each sheet shows, each revision as carried, missed or unclear, and a numbered list of conflicts for your detailer and the engineer of record. Your reviewer holds that list against what actually came back.
written up
// What makes it hard
Where a placing drawing drifts from the design
One drawing, two names, and a checklist that changes by owner. ACI 315R-18 defines placing drawings as the detailed drawings that give quantity, size, dimensions, spacing and locations for fabrication and installation. University of Houston's master Section 03 20 00 calls them shop drawings and wants arrangement and layout, bending and assembly diagrams, bar schedules, stirrup spacing, splices, laps and miscellaneous support bars for the engineer's approval. Wisconsin's state master specification, dated September 10, 2024, adds materials, grades, bent bar diagrams, mechanical coupler and welded splice details, and tie and hoop spacing. So the comparison starts from the section written for that project, not a generic list.
A bar mark is a small piece of code. On Wyoming's bridge plans a straight bar's mark gives its size and length, so 1025-6 is a No. 10 at 25 feet 6 inches. A bent bar's mark gives its size, structural unit and number, so 7A3 is a No. 7 stirrup, with letters for abutments, approach slabs and bents. One Illinois plan sheet shows coated bars with an (E) after the mark. Mile High Flood District wants the mark on the metal bundle tag whenever the drawings use marks, so a wrong one travels with the steel. The draft reads each mark by that project's convention and lists any that trace to no schedule or detail.
Spacing and count have to agree. A placing sheet states a spacing and its bar list states a count, and either can be edited without the other. Wyoming groups bars of changing length on sloped surfaces into a numbered SET, called out by the first and last bar, so a check has to read a range rather than a line. Splices get their own pass: Iowa's Section 2404 allows them only where the contract documents show or the Engineer approves, and Ohio's Item 509 says as specified or determined by the Engineer. The draft recomputes each count from the spacing shown, lists splice locations with no source on the structural set, and says so plainly when that set is silent.
Revisions keep landing after detailing starts. CRSI's Manual of Standard Practice has sections for asking questions on placing drawings, writing an RFI, planning the submittal sequence, revising returned drawings and tracking revisions, and ACI 315R-18 gives review of placing drawings its own chapter, down to levels of approval. For every addendum or answered RFI in force, the draft names the structural sheets it touched and whether each placing sheet shows the change. Outside review can't be assumed, either: Mile High Flood District says the lists and bending diagrams it receives will not be reviewed for accuracy, and holds the contractor responsible for them.
Conflicts get written up, never resolved. ACI 315R-18 cautions that fabrication and placing tolerances, combined with congestion from couplers, headed bars and other accessories, can produce conflicts that are hard to fix in the field, and asks the team to clear them before construction. Ohio has the Engineer approve steel in place before concrete goes in. Each item on the draft list says where it is, what each sheet says and who should answer it. Your reviewer scores that against the conflicts your team found and the ones that came back as corrections or field questions. Include a set returned with corrections and one that changed mid-detailing.
// What you send
What your detailing group gathers
20 to 30 issued placing sets
Placing sheets and bar lists as issued, with their revision history. Include a bridge, a building, and at least one set that went back for correction.
The structural set behind each
Structural sheets, the reinforcing section of the specification, and every addendum, bulletin or answered RFI in force on the day that set was issued.
What came back
Returned sheets with the engineer's marks, your detailer's change log, and the questions the placer raised from the field afterward.
An NDA, then copies
Signed ahead of the first sheet. We stay out of your detailing, production and project systems. When drawings can't leave the building, we build look-alikes with you that keep the same kinds of marks and conflicts.
// Before it starts
Settled before any sheet is copied
The owner and your lead detailer write these down together.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, usually a lead detailer or detailing manager
- Success criteria
- In writing: which conflicts must be found, and how a miss counts
- Drawing sets
- Commercial and public work your reviewer picks
- Who decides
- Your detailer and the engineer of record, on every conflict
- Price
- A range for the live job, set ahead of the test
// How it's scored
What your team caught, beside the draft
| Compared on the same sets | What your team found | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Bar marks traced to a schedule or detail | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
| Spacing as shown, and counts recomputed from it | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
| Bar sizes and grades against the structural notes | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
| Lap and splice locations against the structural set | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
| Addenda and bulletins carried or missed, sheet by sheet | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
| Conflicts listed for the detailer and engineer | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
| Time from a set ready to issue to a list ready to check | Filled in from your drawing sets | Filled in from your drawing sets |
// After a yes
A month of new submissions
After a yes, sets due to go out get a draft comparison for about 30 days, and a person approves each item before it posts anywhere.
Your detailer rules on every item and decides what goes to the engineer. Only your team marks up, issues or submits a sheet, and the same scoring carries through the month.
// Possible next jobs
Where drawing checks could lead
- 01Next
Bar list quantity quotes
A bid set's notes, schedules and details read into a draft sheet, for your estimator to check before pricing.
- 02Then
Addenda against released bars
A new addendum compared with sheets already released, with steel already cut or shipped listed for your project manager.
- 03After that
Field releases and add-on orders
A placer's release for a pour matched to the sheets and bar lists it names, for your production coordinator.
// One hard limit
It never decides the design or approves a drawing.
Your detailer and the engineer of record decide every conflict. The proof of concept never touches your detailing, estimating or production system or a live bid or drawing, never marks up an issued sheet, and never contacts an engineer, contractor or placer. Defense and aerospace work stays out. Standards and agency rules are mentioned for recognition only, and none of this is legal or engineering advice.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
Rob sets the range after hearing how many placing sets your detailers issue in a month and how many addenda a typical job carries.
// Questions
Questions from detailing managers
Will it approve our placing drawings?
Can it read bar marks written an agency's way?
What if the structural drawings disagree with each other?
We detail in a model. Do you need it?
Does the check cover how bars are bent or placed?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Run it on sets your detailers already issued.
Thirty minutes with Rob on your shop, your role and about how many placing sets go out in a month. Keep every sheet on your side until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
