// Pump and valve manufacturers · Data sheet quotes
Pump and valve quotes drafted from the customer's data sheet, with the deviations listed.
A data sheet lands with flow and head or a pressure class, the fluid, materials of construction, end connections and seals, and someone has to answer every field against what you build. A free AI proof of concept has AI do that again on copies of 20 to 30 quotes your applications engineers already sent. Each draft answers the sheet field by field, builds the quote around the selection your engineer made, and lists the deviations for your engineer to write or strike. Your reviewer, the person who knows this desk better than anyone, holds each draft against the quote that went out.
- Past quotes
- 20 to 30
- Pumps or valves selected
- None
- System access
- None
// The one job
From a filled-in data sheet to a quote your engineer can check
The inquiry arrives as a customer's data sheet, an engineer's specification section, or both. Your applications engineer reads the service conditions and what the sheet demands: fluid and temperature, rated flow and head or the pressure class, materials of construction, end connections, seals or packing, the tests and the documents. Then comes the slow part, deciding what you meet as built, what you meet with an option, and what has to be taken as a deviation in writing.
In the test, the selection on each closed quote goes in as your engineer made it, because choosing the pump or valve stays with your people. AI reads the sheet and the spec, answers every field against the quoted model, drafts the quote lines, and lists each mismatch with the clause it came from as a draft deviation. A field it can't answer stays open with a question, and nothing is sent.
for your engineer
// Where it gets hard
Where a data sheet and your product stop agreeing
The test grade is on the page or it isn't. ANSI/HI 14.6, the Hydraulic Institute's acceptance test for rotodynamic pumps, has six grades: 1B, 1E, 1U, 2B, 2U and 3B. Grade 1 is the tightest, the U grades use a one-way tolerance band and the B grades a two-way band, the purchaser and manufacturer are meant to agree on one, and when none is named the standard reverts to a default in its own table. The City of Mercer Island's 2025 sewer pump request names Grade 2B, wants curves of head, efficiency and NPSHr against flow, lets catalog or software curves stand for preliminary approval, and warns that a factory test that varies from those curves may be cause for rejection. So the draft records the grade the sheet asked for, or says the sheet asked for none, and names the curve it relied on.
The standard on the sheet sets the pump. API 610 includes annexes for pump data sheets and for vendor drawing and data requirements, and its type codes describe different machines: BB1 is axially split with single-stage double suction, BB2 is radially split between bearings, OH2 is an overhung horizontal design. A sheet that names a code and a spec that names only a duty need different answers, and inquiries for water service may cite no API standard at all. The draft keeps each requirement in the customer's words and places your quoted model beside it, leaving the decision to your engineer.
Materials are written in more than one language. ASME B16.34 sorts valve materials into Group 1 for carbon and low-alloy steels, Group 2 for stainless and duplex, and Group 3 for nickel and nickel alloys, and pressure-temperature ratings follow the group. A sheet that just says 316 may mean CF8M in a casting to ASTM A351 or F316 in a forging to ASTM A182, and those are different lines on your quote. Tucson Water's published butterfly valve section is specific down to ductile iron ASTM A536 Grade 65-45-12 for the body and disc, type 316 shafts on Class 150B valves and a type 630 shaft on Class 250B, and it rules out sulfur-cured rubber in the seat. The draft carries the material as written, shows your equivalent beside it, and marks any substitution as a deviation for your engineer to decide.
Ends, seals and packing hide in small words. Tucson takes mechanical joint ends to AWWA C110 unless the contract says otherwise, flanges to AWWA C110 for 125/150-pound and ASME/ANSI B16.1 for 250/300-pound at 48 inches and smaller, and AWWA C207 Class E above that with flange thickness designed to ASME Section VIII. It wants chevron V-type packing, rules out stuffing boxes, sizes actuators to 1.5 times the required valve torque and makes the valve maker certify it is responsible for choosing the actuator. In process work the packing line points elsewhere: API 624 became a mandatory part of API 600 after 2014, and a valve certified to it must use packing that meets API 622. A pump sheet may name an API 682 seal category and a piping plan such as Plan 11 or Plan 53A. Each of these is its own field on the draft.
Deviations are the judgment, and your reviewer watches them closely. A specification that says no exceptions leaves your engineer deciding before the quote leaves, since after the order is too late. The draft lists each clause your standard product doesn't meet on the page, quotes the customer's words and proposes wording, and your engineer writes, softens or strikes it. Your reviewer, usually the lead applications engineer, checks that every field was answered, that nothing was dropped without a note, and that each deviation your engineer wrote also appears in the draft.
// What you send
Closed quotes from the applications desk
20 to 30 closed quotes
Each inquiry as it arrived, the data sheet and specification behind it, and the quote and deviation list that went back. Include ones you won, ones you lost and one you passed on, with pumps and valves both if you build both.
Your engineer's selection on each
The model, size, trim or impeller your engineer chose, exactly as entered on that quote. The draft takes it as given.
Your catalog and option lists
Standard materials, options, test offerings and the deviation wording your engineers reuse, as PDFs, exports or a workbook, as they stood on each quote date.
Copies once the NDA is signed
Signed before any data sheet moves, with customer names masked if you prefer. We never sign in to your ERP, configurator or quality system. If a customer's terms keep a sheet inside your building, we build look-alikes with you.
// Before it starts
Settled before the first sheet is copied
The owner puts each of these in writing before anything leaves the applications desk.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, usually the lead applications engineer
- Success criteria
- In writing: which fields must match, how deviations are scored
- Sample
- Picked by your reviewer, with one spec that says no exceptions
- Who selects
- Your engineer, in the test and live
- Price
- A range for the live job, stated up front
- NDA
- Signed before a single sheet is copied
// How it's scored
The quote your desk sent, beside each draft
| On the same 20 to 30 quotes | The quote that went out | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Every data sheet field answered against the quoted model | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
| Service conditions carried over: fluid, temperature, flow and head or class | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
| Materials of construction, with any equivalents marked | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
| End connections, seals and packing as the sheet called them | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
| Test grade, witness and document requirements listed | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
| Deviations your engineer took, and any the draft missed | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
| Fields left open, each with a question | Marked on your own quotes | Marked on your own quotes |
// After a yes
About 30 days on new inquiries
A yes from your reviewer moves the same drafting onto new data sheets for about 30 days.
Every quote leaves from your own system after your applications engineer has checked and corrected it, and each selection stays with that engineer. The scoring table keeps running on live inquiries, and any next job is a separate decision with its own price. Monthly support comes after that.
// Jobs that could follow
Where the applications desk could go next
- 01Next
Test and material documents
The package for each order checked against its purchase order before it ships, for your quality staff to release.
- 02Then
Repair and spares quotes
A serial number traced to the build record, with wear parts listed from your own parts book.
- 03After that
Drawing and data submittals
Outline drawings, curves and parts lists sorted by what each buyer wants and when it is due.
// One hard limit
It never selects a pump or valve, and never touches a live quote.
The draft takes the selection your engineer made. It doesn't size, select or rate anything for a service, and it doesn't say that a valve meets a class or a pump meets a duty. It never opens your ERP, configurator or quality system, and it never touches a live quote. An applications engineer checks every quote before it goes anywhere. This page describes public standards and is not engineering or legal advice. Defense and aerospace inquiries stay out of the test.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
Rob gives the range on the call, once he knows how many inquiries your desk answers in a month and how many product lines the data sheets cover.
// Questions
Data sheet quoting questions
Will the AI pick the pump or valve?
Our data sheets arrive as scanned PDFs, spreadsheets and Word files. Does that work?
Can it write our deviations and exceptions?
What if the sheet names a standard we have never quoted?
Do you need access to our configurator or selection software?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Bring the data sheet your engineers spent longest on.
Half an hour with Rob. He will ask about your product lines, your role, the job you'd test and about how many inquiries come in each month. Every data sheet stays with you until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
