30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
Industrial, architectural and protective coatings

// AI for paint and coatings manufacturers

AI for paint and coatings manufacturers, tried first on work your regulatory and technical people already closed.

For formulators of industrial, architectural and protective coatings. There are two desks to start from: safety data sheet revisions arriving from raw-material suppliers, and customer specifications that have to be read against your technical data sheets. A free AI proof of concept takes one of them and runs it on copies of 20 to 30 cases already finished. Your formulation system, ERP and SDS authoring tool stay untouched, and formulas stay home unless you decide otherwise. Your reviewer, the colleague who knows that work best, compares every draft with what your team did.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Coatings proof of conceptAgreed before any file moves
First job
SDS revisions, or specification checks
From you
20 to 30 closed cases, copied once the NDA is signed
Formulas
Left out unless you choose to add them
Never
A hazard classified, a spec ruled on, a live document changed
Reviewer
Named by the owner up front
Left out
Defense and aerospace work
Price
A range first, fixed before signing

// Jobs we would test

Two desks to test first, two that could follow

Regulatory or technical service
One job at a time

// Why these two first

Both start with someone else's document and end with your signature

The trade runs on other people's chemistry. The Census Bureau defines paint and coating manufacturing, NAICS 325510, as mixing pigments, solvents and binders into paints, stains, varnishes, lacquers, enamels, shellacs and water-repellent coatings, along with allied products such as putties, paint and varnish removers, brush cleaners and frit. Each resin, solvent, pigment and additive behind those products has a supplier's safety data sheet, and any of those sheets can be reissued. One reissue can reach a whole product line.

Closed revisions make a fair test. For every past supplier revision your files hold the old sheet, the new one and whatever your regulatory person did about it, including the decision to change nothing. That record is the answer key each draft is held against. It can run from a where-used list instead of a formula.

Specifications arrive in the buyer's numbering. The University of Houston's master construction specifications, for one, divide this work among Section 09 91 13 Exterior Painting, 09 91 23 Interior Painting and 09 96 00 High-Performance Coatings. Products there are called out through MPI's Approved Products List, which MPI says it updates monthly as products are added and removed. Technical service answers those sections one at a time, so last year's replies are ready to score against.

A data sheet can set your VOC limit. Under EPA's national rule for architectural coatings, 40 CFR Part 59 Subpart D, a container, label or piece of sales, advertising or technical literature that represents a coating as fitting more than one category triggers the most restrictive limit, with listed exceptions. That rule puts industrial maintenance coatings at 450 grams per liter and leaves states and districts free to go further, and South Coast AQMD's Rule 1113 sets its industrial maintenance category at 100. A sentence on a data sheet can matter more than it looks, which is why the check reads every line.

The standards' owners changed before the paperwork did. NACE International and SSPC combined into the Association for Materials Protection and Performance on January 6, 2021, yet specifications keep citing the older names. A section Indiana's DOT revised in April 2021 still calls for SSPC PA 2. A useful draft has to treat every spelling of a callout as the same callout.

One limit holds for both jobs. The proof of concept never touches your formulation system, ERP or SDS authoring system or a live document. It never decides a hazard classification or whether a product meets a specification. A qualified regulatory or technical person checks every change list and signs every answer. Defense and aerospace work stays out, and nothing here is legal or regulatory advice.

// How the test runs

From closed files to a yes or a no

  1. Step 01

    Pick the desk and the reviewer

    The owner names a reviewer, usually the regulatory manager for sheets or a technical service lead for specifications. Success criteria go in writing, you hear a price range for running the job live, and the NDA is signed before a single page moves.

  2. Step 02

    Run it on closed cases

    Send copies of 20 to 30 supplier revisions with what your team changed, or 20 to 30 specifications with the replies that went out. Anything that can't leave the building becomes a look-alike we build with you. Each draft then sits beside the real outcome for scoring.

  3. Step 03

    A month on new work, after a yes

    New revisions or new specifications go through the same job for about 30 days, and a person on your team approves each item before it goes anywhere. Another job means another decision and its own price.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

Rob sets the range on the call from three counts: revisions or specifications handled in a month, finished products in your catalog, and the regions you sell into.

// Questions

What coatings makers ask first

Do you need our formulas?
No. Copies of sheets and data sheets and a where-used list are enough, and that list can leave out every percentage. Formulas join the test only if you choose to include them.
Will the AI classify a product or say it meets a specification?
Never. It lists what changed and where someone should look, or what a specification asks and what your data sheet says. Classifying a hazard and answering a customer stay with your qualified people, who sign the result.
Does this connect to our formulation software, ERP or SDS authoring system?
No. The test uses only copies, and nobody logs in to those systems or edits a live document. What the live month would need from them is agreed and priced before you sign.
We sell architectural paint and protective coatings. Which side goes first?
Whichever side has the most closed examples and a reviewer who knows them. The paperwork differs between the two, so the other side would be a separate test with its own success criteria.
Is any of this legal or regulatory advice?
No. Drafts cite the rule or document behind each line so your reviewer can check them. How a rule applies to a product is for your regulatory staff and counsel.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof of concept call

Start with last quarter's supplier revisions.

Thirty minutes with Rob on your product lines, your role, which desk you would test first and roughly how many revisions or specifications land each month. Keep formulas and documents with you until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.