// Machine builders · Turnover package
Turnover documents, checked against the PO's list before the machine ships.
For machine builders whose project managers put together a turnover package for every machine. One job, tested in a free AI proof of concept on machines you already shipped. Each AI draft reads the PO's document list and every standard it names, finds the manual, drawing, parts list or component file that answers each item, and marks what is missing, mislabeled or in the wrong format. Your project manager decides what ships, and nothing is signed or certified.
- Past machines
- 20 to 30
- Declarations signed
- None
- System access
- None
// The one job
The PO names the documents. The package has to match.
A buyer's PO arrives with a document list attached, or points to a supplier documentation standard: manuals in named languages, electrical and fluid diagrams, as-built drawings, the parts list, component makers' data, declarations and test reports, each in a set format and due by a set date. Before the machine ships, your project manager or documentation lead collects every item from engineering, purchasing and the floor, checks it against that list and releases the package.
In the proof of concept, AI reads copies of POs you already shipped against and the packages that went with them, and drafts the check your project manager would make: each required item, the file that answers it, its format, language and file name, the serial numbers it carries, and what was missing or came back from the buyer. Nothing goes to a buyer, and no document is changed.
to a file in the package
// What the PO really asks
Why a turnover package comes back from the buyer
The PO often brings someone else's standard. Large buyers attach document rules that outrank your usual index. One German machine tool maker's published spec for its suppliers puts its end customer's equipment regulations ahead of its own. It wants each document as a separate file, never all the reports merged into one PDF, under a folder named with the end customer's equipment number, plus inspection documents for safety components such as hydraulic accumulators and safety valves. Until that documentation has passed its inspection, it treats the delivery as incomplete and holds back full payment. So the check starts from the PO and every standard it names.
For Europe, the manual's labels are rules. Annex I of the Machinery Directive wants the instructions in the official language of the member state where the machine is placed on the market or put into service. Versions the manufacturer verified carry the words "Original instructions"; any other language carries "Translation of the original instructions" and ships with the original. The manual also holds the EC declaration of conformity, or a document setting out its contents, which need not show the serial number or the signature. Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 allows digital instructions if the machine or its packaging says where to find them, the user can print and save them, and they stay online for the machine's expected lifetime and at least 10 years after it is placed on the market; a buyer who asks at purchase gets paper, free, within one month. A module that can't work until it is built into another line can be partly completed machinery, shipped with assembly instructions and a declaration of incorporation.
US standards and file rules add items of their own. NFPA 79's Chapter 17, in the 2024 edition, has sections for the installation diagram, block and function diagrams, circuit diagrams, and the operating and maintenance manuals. ANSI B11.0-2023 updated its requirements for information for use and manuals to be consistent with ISO 20607, the instruction handbook standard. One gearbox maker's supplier standard wants a single unencrypted PDF per language, preferably PDF/A, with bookmarks that match the contents and every font embedded, and safety warnings in US-bound manuals structured to ANSI Z535.6. Another buyer wants the ISO language code, such as en-US, in each file name and electrical diagrams in EPLAN unless told otherwise.
Bought-out parts bring their own paperwork. An automotive paint-systems supplier's published spec asks for the original makers' data sheets for every catalog part, a maintenance plan that covers sub-suppliers' parts without sending the reader off to their manuals, and declarations written to both the Machinery Directive and the new Regulation; it refuses download links to company websites. A machine with an ASME Section VIII, Division 1 vessel, such as an air receiver, carries that vessel's U-1A Manufacturer's Data Report, signed by the vessel maker's representative and by an Authorized Inspector, and a registered report can be found by its National Board number or the maker's serial number. The draft checks that each file is there and that its serial numbers match your records. It never signs, certifies or edits one.
Your reviewer. The owner names the person who releases turnover today, usually the project manager or documentation lead. They hold each draft check against the package that shipped and whatever the buyer sent back: items found and items missed, formats, languages and file names, serial numbers, declarations present, and component data. Include a machine bound for Europe, a module shipped into someone else's line, and a package the buyer returned.
// What you send
What your project managers gather
PO document lists for 20 to 30 machines
The document list or supplier standard attached to each PO, with every specification it names, from machines you already shipped.
The packages that shipped
Each turnover package as it went out, plus every comment, rejection or request for more that the buyer sent back afterward.
Your own index and naming rules
The document register, index or checklist your team works from today, with the serial number and the buyer's equipment number for each machine.
An NDA before any package moves
Signed first. Nobody logs in to your PDM vault, your document control system or a buyer's supplier portal, at any point in the test.
Look-alike packages, if needed
If a buyer's terms keep its documents inside your company, we build a look-alike PO list and package with you that keep the hard cases.
// Before it starts
Settled before the first package is copied
The owner and your lead project manager agree each of these in writing first.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, usually the project manager who releases turnover
- Success criteria
- In writing: items the check must find, and errors it must catch
- Declarations
- Checked as present and matching the machine, never signed or judged
- Price
- A range for live turnover checks, given up front
- Machines
- Commercial machines picked by your reviewer, no defense or aerospace orders
// How it's scored
The package you released, beside the draft check
| Compared on the same machines | What your team released | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Time from package assembled to draft check ready for review | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
| Every item on the PO's document list found or marked missing | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
| Format, language and file name as the PO's standard asks | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
| Original and translation labels on every manual | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
| Serial and equipment numbers matching across manuals, reports and declarations | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
| Component makers' data present as files, not links | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
| Items the buyer sent back, caught before shipment | Filled in from your packages | Filled in from your packages |
// After a yes
About 30 days on machines heading to shipment
After a yes, each machine nearing shipment gets a draft check against its PO's document list, kept current as files arrive, for about 30 days.
Your project manager reviews every check, chases what is missing and releases the package from your own system. Nothing reaches a buyer without that release, and each live check is scored on the same table as the test.
// Later, ranked
Where turnover checks could lead
- 01Next
Recommended spare parts lists
The spares list for each new machine drafted from its as-built BOM under the buyer's own headings, with quantities left for your parts manager.
- 02Then
Revised packages after a field change
A retrofit's drawings, parts list and manual pages listed against the package already on file, for your project manager to reissue.
- 03After that
Spare parts quotes
Requests for parts on machines already running, matched to each one's build record and priced by your parts desk.
// One hard limit
It never certifies a machine or signs a declaration.
Whether a machine conforms, which rules apply and what its safety rating is are your engineers' decisions, and a declaration of conformity or incorporation is signed by the person your company names. The draft checks that documents are present, labeled and consistent. It certifies no document, test or safety rating, sets no spare quantity or price, decides nothing about what is critical, and sends nothing to a buyer: your project manager decides and releases. Defense and aerospace orders, drawings and specs stay out, as on every manufacturing page.
Turnover checking carries its own price: a range up front, then a fixed price once the test is done and before you sign.
The range follows how many machines you ship a year and how many buyer document standards your packages have to meet.
// Questions
Turnover questions from machine builders
Will it check whether our machine meets CE marking or NFPA 79?
Buyers send their document lists as spreadsheets with their own codes. Can it work from those?
Our PLC program and HMI change during commissioning. How does the check handle that?
We ship machines to Europe and to the US. Does the check cover both?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Bring packages for machines you already shipped.
Thirty minutes with Rob. Booking takes your company, your role, the job you'd hand over first and roughly how many machines ship a year. Hold back POs, drawings and manuals until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
