30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
Job 02 · Carrier follow-up

// Habitational insurance agencies · Loss control recommendation files

Loss control recommendations, matched to the insured's replies before the carrier's deadline.

A carrier's loss control rep walks an apartment or condominium property and a letter follows. Someone at your agency then chases the insured, matches each reply to each item and watches the carrier's date. In a free AI proof of concept, AI builds that file from copies of 20 to 30 recommendation letters your team has closed. Your reviewer, the person who handles those letters best, compares each file with how it really closed.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Closed letters
20 to 30
Replies sent to carriers
None
Items marked complete
None

// The one job

From a carrier's letter to a file your account manager can act on

The letter lists what the carrier wants changed, usually naming the building, with a date it wants to hear back. Your account manager forwards it to the owner or the property manager and waits. Replies come in as invoices, contractor letters, photos and one-line emails, some answering half an item and some answering a different one. Somebody has to pair each with the right recommendation and get an answer back in time.

For the test, AI reads copies of the letter and everything that came back, then builds a recommendation file: each recommendation as written, the building it applies to, the due date and any extension on file, each document received beside the item it speaks to, and what is still open. It calls nothing complete. Your reviewer holds each file against how that letter actually closed.

Carrier's letterRecommendations
Policy no.
Survey date
Location
Reply by
Rec. no.BuildingDue
Illustration, not a real letter
Matched to
the insured's replies
Recommendation fileDraft
Reply received
Documents
Still open
Next date
As writtenDocumentStatus
Made-up file, for illustration

// What makes it hard

Why a carrier's letter is harder to close than it reads

The letter is about insurability. ISO's Common Policy Conditions, form IL 00 17, gives the insurer the right to inspect, report what it finds and recommend changes, and says those steps relate only to insurability and the premiums to be charged. It disclaims safety inspections and any warranty that conditions are safe or comply with laws, codes or standards. So a file records what the carrier asked and whether the carrier accepted the answer, never whether the building is safe. The draft keeps to that line.

What an open item can mean depends on the state. Maine's 24-A section 3007 lists failure to comply with reasonable loss control recommendations among the grounds for cancelling a property policy before it expires, excepts surplus lines contracts and has the notice state the effective date and the reason. Louisiana's R.S. 22:1267 lists the same failure among acts that change or increase a hazard, reaches commercial property, leaves out surplus lines, and since July 1, 2026 has called for 60 days' notice on that ground. The Office of General Counsel of New York's insurance regulator went the other way in a 2009 opinion: failing to comply with an insurer's recommendations is not, by itself, a valid basis to cancel a new or renewed commercial lines policy under section 3426. The file names the policy's state and leaves the reading to your licensed staff. This is a short summary, not legal or insurance advice.

Every item has a building and someone who has to act. One carrier's habitational supplemental asks who is responsible for building maintenance and upkeep: the applicant, a professional property management service or someone else. The same form asks about pools with slides or diving boards, fencing and visible depth markings, playground surfaces, grills on balconies, porches or wood decks, and whether smoke detectors are hard-wired or battery, and if battery, how often they are checked. A recommendation can point at any of those, on one building out of many, and each needs different proof: a photo, an invoice, a log. The draft keeps the owner, the manager and the building straight on every line.

A reply has to say what was done. Aluminum branch wiring shows why. The Consumer Product Safety Commission's Publication 516, dated June 2011, approves only three methods as a permanent repair: complete replacement with copper cable, the COPALUM crimp method, and the AlumiConn connector where COPALUM isn't available, and it recommends against other crimp connectors. An invoice that says only that the wiring was repaired doesn't show which. Whether a repair satisfies the recommendation is the carrier's call, so the draft lists what the document actually says and leaves the item open until someone licensed decides.

Some items sit closer to coverage, and some answers already exist. A protective safeguards endorsement makes named protections, such as an automatic sprinkler system, a condition of coverage, and an unreported impairment can suspend that coverage until the protection is back. When a recommendation touches a safeguard listed on the policy, the draft puts it first for your account manager. And public owners write this into their buying: the Clarion County Housing and Redevelopment Authority's 2026 request wants insurers willing to provide inspection and loss prevention services, with copies of all reports and recommendations sent to the authority, which also inspects every unit annually under federal rules. An item may be answered by a report made for another reason, if someone connects the two.

// What you send

Letters your team has already closed

Copies only
Tenant details removed
01

20 to 30 closed letters

Each carrier's loss control letter or survey report, with the replies your team sent and how the carrier closed it. Include one that ran past its date and one covering several buildings.

02

What the insured sent back

Invoices, contractor letters, photos, inspection reports and maintenance logs, as they came in, including the ones that turned out not to answer anything.

03

Enough of the policy

The declarations, the building list and any protective safeguards endorsement, so each item can be tied to a named building and a listed protection.

04

Names and unit details removed

The NDA comes first. Copies then come with tenant names, complaints about particular tenants and photos of people taken out. We never sign in to a carrier's site or your agency management system.

// Before it starts

Settled before any letter is copied

The agency's owner signs off on each of these in writing first.

Terms for the recommendations testAgreed up front
Your reviewer
The owner's choice, often whoever runs carrier follow-up
Success criteria
In writing: which items must be caught, and how open items get listed
Letters
Picked by your reviewer: several carriers, apartments and condominiums
Who decides
Your licensed staff: what counts as answered, and every word to the carrier
Price
Quoted as a range for the live month before letters are copied
NDA
Signed before the first letter moves

// How the test is judged

How each letter really closed, beside each file

Letter by letter
item by item
Across the same 20 to 30 lettersHow your team closed itFile from the test
Every recommendation, as the carrier wrote itFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
The building each item applies toFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
Due dates, and any extension on fileFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
Documents received against each itemFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
What was still open at the deadlineFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
Items touching a protection listed on the policyFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
Time from a letter arriving to a file ready to checkFilled in on your lettersFilled in on your letters
Nothing filled in yet. These cells stay empty until your own closed letters have gone through.Your reviewer checks every item and gives the verdict.

// After a yes

A month of live carrier letters

If your reviewer says yes, new recommendation letters get the same file for about 30 days.

A licensed person reads every file and decides what is answered, what to chase and what to tell the carrier. Replies leave your agency the way they do today.

Any further job is your call, one at a time and priced on its own, with monthly support after that.

// Possible next jobs

After the letters, if you choose

Ranked, not promised
Each priced alone
  1. 01

    Statement of values updates

    Buildings, update dates and sprinkler status reconciled before renewal, using what these files show was actually repaired.

    Next
  2. 02

    Follow-up notes to insureds

    A draft note for each open item, naming the document still needed, for your account manager to edit and send.

    Then
  3. 03

    Renewal narrative for the underwriter

    Completed work from the closed files written up as notes your account manager can use at market.

    After that

// One hard limit

No reply goes to a carrier from the AI.

Whether an item is answered, what to chase and what the carrier hears are for your licensed staff. Your agency management system, carrier portals, live policies and live submissions all stay outside the test. It never decides coverage, never sets a building's value and binds nothing. Each decision is made, and each reply sent, by a licensed person at your agency.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

Rob gives the range on the call, once he knows how many carriers send you these letters and how many are open at any one time.

// Questions

Recommendation letter questions

Will the AI tell a carrier a recommendation is done?
No. It lists each item, what came back and what is open. Your account manager decides what to say, and a licensed person sends every reply from your agency.
Can it decide whether a contractor's invoice satisfies a recommendation?
No. It shows which item the document seems to speak to and what the document actually says. Whether that is enough is for your licensed staff and the carrier.
Every carrier's letter looks different. Is that a problem?
That is why the sample should include several carriers. The draft keeps each recommendation in the carrier's own words, so a different layout changes the reading and not the result your reviewer checks.
Do you need access to a carrier's loss control portal?
No. Send copies of what the carrier sent you and what the insured sent back. The test never logs in to a carrier's site or to your agency management system.
What about photos and complaints that name tenants?
Your office removes them first. The test needs the building, the item and the document, and it never needs to know who lives in a unit.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof of concept call

Start with letters your team already closed.

Thirty minutes with Rob on your agency, your part in it, the carriers sending you these letters and about how many are open right now. Letters, replies and photos stay with you until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.