// Freight forwarding · Also open
Letter of credit documents checked against the credit before they go to the bank.
One job, tested on copies of 20 to 30 export shipments your team already presented under a letter of credit. AI reads the credit and every amendment, then checks each document against the credit and against the rest of the set: invoice, bill of lading, packing list, certificate of origin and insurance. Your reviewer compares each check with what the bank actually accepted or refused.
- Past presentations
- 20 to 30
- Bank, carrier or AES access
- None
- Who decides what is presented
- Your documentation lead
// The one job
A credit arrives. A checked document set goes to your documentation lead.
Today a credit reaches the exporter through its bank, and your documentation desk reads it before the cargo moves: the latest shipment date, the ports, the documents required and how many originals, the extra conditions, and the days allowed to present. After sailing, someone gathers the exporter's invoice and packing list, the bill of lading, the certificate of origin and any insurance document, and checks each one against the credit before the set goes to the bank. The Commerce Department's Trade Finance Guide describes the same step, with the forwarder or the exporter presenting, and the FMC lists sending documents to banks and advising exporters on letters of credit among freight forwarding services.
In the proof of concept, AI does that first check. It lists every term in the credit and marks each document against it, then compares the documents with one another: names, addresses, marks, quantities, weights, dates and the description of the goods. Each finding cites the clause and the page. Nothing is presented, signed or sent to a bank.
and compared
// What makes the check hard
Banks read the documents alone, and they read them strictly.
The credit's routing picks the rule. Under UCP 600, banks judge a presentation on the documents alone, and a transport document is examined under the article that fits the shipment the credit describes, not the title printed on it. The ICC Banking Commission's paper on on-board notations explains it through the SWIFT fields: a credit naming only a port of loading (44E) and a port of discharge (44F) points to a port-to-port document such as a bill of lading, while only a place of receipt (44A) and a place of final destination (44B) point to a multimodal, road or rail document. A bill showing receipt in Paris, loading in Rotterdam and discharge in Hong Kong, under a credit for Rotterdam to Hong Kong, is still checked as a bill of lading under Article 20. The check reads those fields first and names the article each transport document will be held to.
On board, and signed by whom. Article 20 wants the goods shown on board a named vessel at the credit's port of loading, by pre-printed wording or a dated on-board notation. The issue date counts as the shipment date unless a notation gives one, and a bill naming an "intended vessel" needs a notation with the actual vessel. Door-to-port bookings trip here: when a bill shows an inland place of receipt, ICC opinions have required a dated notation naming the vessel and the port of loading even on a pre-printed shipped-on-board form. Under FCA, Incoterms 2020 lets the parties agree that the buyer has its carrier issue an on-board bill to the seller. A clause declaring the goods or their packing defective makes a bill unclean, though the word clean never has to appear on it. Sub-article 14(l) lets a party other than the carrier issue the transport document, which covers a forwarder's house bill, but signing is a separate test the bill still has to pass.
The invoice has four fixed tests. Sub-article 18(a) has it appear issued by the beneficiary, made out to the applicant and in the credit's currency, and it need not be signed; under 18(c) its description must correspond with the credit's. The ICC's Technical Advisory Briefing No. 7, dated July 6, 2023, adds that a document titled simply invoice answers a call for a commercial invoice, while one marked provisional or pro-forma fails unless the credit allows it. Other documents may describe the goods in general terms that don't conflict with the credit, and data across the set need not be identical but must not conflict. A gross weight on the packing list that disagrees with the bill of lading, or shipping marks that differ between documents, is what the check lists, and your lead decides whether it is a conflict.
Three clocks run at once. Unless the credit sets its own period, a presentation with original transport documents must reach the bank within 21 calendar days after shipment and never after expiry. The insurance document may not be dated after shipment unless it shows cover starting by then, and the trade term changes what that document must say: under Incoterms 2020, CIF still defaults to the narrower Institute Cargo Clauses (C), while CIP now calls for Clauses (A). Once the bank has the set, it has at most five banking days after presentation to decide, and a refusal must come in a single notice by the close of the fifth banking day. The check puts the latest shipment date, the last day to present and the expiry at the top.
Your own name on the bill, and what your reviewer watches. FMC rules at 46 CFR 515.42 put the actual shipper in the shipper box of the bill of lading, with a forwarder's name there only as the shipper's agent, and 515.31 has a licensed intermediary print its FMC license number wherever its name appears on shipping documents. Census rules at 15 CFR 30.7 put the AES proof of filing citation or exemption legend on the first page of the bill, air waybill or other loading document. The FMC also has an intermediary that spots an error in a bill of lading or export declaration tell its principal promptly and stay out of that transaction until it is fixed, so the check reports and never edits. Your reviewer, the person who knows your export documentation best, usually the documentation lead, looks hardest at on-board notations, the presentation deadline, and conflicts between the invoice and the bill.
// What you send
What the bank received, and what it said
20 to 30 past presentations
Export shipments from the past year or two that went to a bank under a letter of credit. Include a few the bank refused, or paid only after the applicant waived a discrepancy.
Each credit and its amendments
The credit as your desk received it, every amendment, and any checklist your team or the exporter's bank built from it. Amendments change the answer, so the test needs all of them.
The documents presented
Invoice, packing list, bill of lading or air waybill, certificate of origin, insurance document and any inspection or beneficiary certificate, as copies of what went to the bank.
The bank's answer, and an NDA
The bank's acceptance, its refusal notice listing the discrepancies, or the waiver. That is the answer key. The NDA comes first, account numbers and payment details come blacked out, and we never log in to a bank, a carrier or AES.
// Before it starts
Agreed before the first credit moves
The owner puts four choices in writing before any credit leaves your office.
- Reviewer
- Named by the owner. Usually your documentation lead or export manager.
- Success criteria
- Which conflicts a check must catch, and how a false alarm weighs against a miss
- Sample
- Chosen by your reviewer from past presentations, refusals included
- Price
- A range for the live job
// How the test is judged
The bank's answer against the check
| On the same 20 to 30 shipments | What the bank said | The AI check |
|---|---|---|
| Terms of the credit and its amendments listed | Filled in on your presentations | Filled in on your presentations |
| Transport document held to the right article | Filled in on your presentations | Filled in on your presentations |
| On-board notation, shipment date and ports | Filled in on your presentations | Filled in on your presentations |
| Invoice issuer, applicant, currency and description | Filled in on your presentations | Filled in on your presentations |
| Conflicts between documents in the set | Filled in on your presentations | Filled in on your presentations |
| Discrepancies the bank raised, caught or missed | Filled in on your presentations | Filled in on your presentations |
// After a yes
About 30 days on new credits
If your reviewer says yes, new credits go through the same job for about 30 days: a term list when the credit arrives, then a full check when the documents are in.
Each check waits for your documentation lead, who decides what to correct, what to present and when. The AI never presents, signs or changes a document, never files EEI or anything else, and never contacts an exporter, an importer, a carrier, a bank or CBP.
Live checks are graded the same way, against the success criteria written before the test.
// Later, one at a time
Where export documentation could lead
- 01Next
House bills from shipping instructions
The booking and the shipper's instructions drafted into the house bill, with the credit's wording carried onto it before it issues.
- 02Then
Certificates of origin from the invoice
Origin certificates drafted from the invoice and packing list for your team to submit for certification.
- 03After that
Customs entries on the import side
For forwarders with a licensed brokerage, invoices drafted into entry lines for the broker to decide.
// One hard limit
Your team decides what goes to the bank.
The proof of concept works only on copies and reports what it finds. It never presents, signs or edits a document, never classifies goods, never files or transmits an entry, an ISF, EEI or any other filing, never decides value, origin or admissibility, and never contacts an exporter, an importer, a carrier, a bank or CBP. Anything that is customs business is decided and signed by a licensed customs broker. Nothing here is legal or banking advice.
Priced per job: a range before the proof of concept, a fixed price before you sign.
The range comes on the call, after we ask how many credits you handle a month and how many documents a typical one calls for.
// Questions
What documentation leads ask
Does it decide whether a discrepancy exists?
Does it follow ISBP as well as UCP 600?
Do you need our bank or carrier portal logins?
Will it correct the documents for us?
Does this cover air and multimodal shipments?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Start with credits your desk already presented.
A 30-minute call with Rob Eason. Booking asks about your company and your part in export documentation, the job you want tested, and roughly how many letter of credit shipments you handle in a month. Send no credit or document until the NDA is signed by both sides.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
