// Environmental testing labs · Bottle orders and sampling kits
Bottle orders and sampling kits, drafted from the client's analyte list.
A consultant sends a sampling plan, a water system sends its monitoring schedule, and someone at your sample control desk works out which bottles, how many, with what in them, and in which cooler. In a free AI proof of concept, AI drafts that kit order for 20 to 30 requests you already filled, using your own bottle chart and the rules behind it. Your reviewer, the person on your team who knows your kits best, sets each draft beside the kit that actually went out.
- Kit orders tested
- 20 to 30, already shipped
- Kits packed or shipped
- None
- Rules it draws on
- Your bottle chart
// The one job
From a sampling plan to a kit order your desk can check
Today a sample control tech or project manager reads the request, matches every method to a line on the bottle chart, counts bottles per location, adds volume for the lab's own QC, puts blanks in where volatiles or PFAS travel, and writes up the coolers, ice, labels and custody forms for bottle prep. A plan that leaves out the matrix or whether the water is chlorinated means a phone call before anything is packed.
In the proof of concept, AI reads copies of the same requests, plans and bottle chart and drafts the kit order line by line: location, method, container, size, preservative, count and holding time, then the blanks, coolers and forms. Each line names the chart row or method it came from, and every open point goes on a question list. Nothing is packed, shipped or sent to the client.
for sample control
// What makes it hard
Where a kit order goes wrong before anyone samples
One analyte, a different bottle in each program. For a wastewater permit, Table II in 40 CFR 136.3 has cyanide raised above pH 10 with sodium hydroxide, plus a reducing agent if an oxidizer is present, and held 14 days. For a public water system, 40 CFR 141.23 has cyanide brought to pH 12 at collection, and nitrate held 48 hours, or 14 days if the sample is chlorinated and left unacidified. Hexavalent chromium in wastewater sits at pH 9.3 to 9.7, and its 28-day hold depends on the ammonium sulfate buffer named in EPA Method 218.6. Oil and grease goes only in glass. So the draft first settles which program each sample is for, and asks when the plan doesn't say.
Trace work changes the bottle itself. Low-level mercury by EPA Method 1631 needs fluoropolymer or glass bottles, bromine monochloride or hydrochloric acid within 48 hours, and analysis within 90 days. PFAS in drinking water by EPA Method 537.1, version 2.0, goes in a 250 mL polypropylene bottle with a polypropylene cap, with Trizma added as a solid at 5.0 grams per liter before the bottle leaves the lab, and must stay at or below 10 °C for the first 48 hours. Every set needs a field reagent blank: reagent water filled at the lab and a second bottle holding only preservative, poured together at the site, with the same preservative batch as the samples. Method 533 uses ammonium acetate and holds 28 days instead of 14. The draft adds those blanks to every PFAS set and notes the batch for bottle prep.
Volatiles bring vials, blanks and a choice about acid. SW-846 Chapter Four, revision 6 from December 2018, recommends three 40 mL vials with PTFE-lined septum caps for water, acidified below pH 2 and held 14 days, but no acid and 7 days when MTBE or other fuel oxygenates are expected and a high-temperature preparation will be used. Chlorinated water goes first into a 125 mL container already dosed with sodium thiosulfate. Vials from different samples are bagged apart, and a trip blank of organic-free reagent water travels with them through sampling, shipping and storage. The chapter calls its table guidance, not an EPA requirement, and defers to the project's data quality objectives, so the draft follows your chart and the client's plan and lists any place they disagree.
Shipping and the clock. Table II says a sample sent by common carrier or mail must meet DOT's hazardous materials rules in 49 CFR part 172, the shipper is responsible, and DOT has found those rules don't reach dilute acid or sodium hydroxide preservative below set strengths. Water for metals may travel without acid if acid goes in at least 24 hours before analysis, and soil and sediment need none. For SW-846 holds of 7 days or more, a May 2020 letter from EPA's Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery counts a Tuesday sample as on time through the end of the following Tuesday, and says states can be stricter. The draft states each bottle's hold in its program's terms and leaves dates and rush calls to your desk.
Kits for people who aren't samplers. As 40 CFR 141.86 now reads, a lead and copper tap sample is one liter, drawn after the water has stood at least six hours, in a wide-mouth bottle whose mouth is at least 40 mm across. At lead service line sites in the first two tiers it becomes a first-liter and fifth-liter pair from five numbered bottles filled in order. The instructions may not tell residents to remove the aerator or flush first, and acid can be added up to 14 days later so they never handle nitric acid. The draft takes each address's tier from the water system's site plan, never guessing it. Your reviewer will check every bottle, preservative, count, blank, hold, cooler and form against the kit your desk packed.
// What you send
Copies from your sample control desk
20 to 30 filled requests
For each, the client's request or sampling plan, the kit order or bottle sheet your desk wrote, and the custody forms that went in the cooler. Include a rush, a mixed soil and water job, and one that came back short of bottles.
Your bottle chart
The container, preservative and holding-time table your desk works from, by method and program, plus any client or state variations, as it stood when those kits went out.
No logins
Nobody here signs in to your LIMS, your client portal or your shipping accounts. You send copies; the inventory, the packing and the shipping stay with your team.
NDA first, then look-alikes
Site names, well IDs and client contacts stay with you until the NDA is signed. If a client's plan can't leave the lab, your reviewer helps us build look-alike requests.
// Before it starts
Agreed before the first request moves
A wrong bottle is found only when the sampler is standing at the well, so the owner settles the rules first.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, often the sample control or bottle prep lead
- Rule source
- Your bottle chart, with the method or program behind each row
- Open points
- Listed as questions for your desk, never guessed
- Success criteria
- Written first: bottles, counts, preservatives, blanks and holds
- Price
- A range for drafting kit orders live
- NDA
- Signed before any client plan moves
// How it's judged
Each draft order beside the kit you packed
| On the same 20 to 30 requests | The kit you packed | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Every location and method on the plan covered, nothing extra | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| Container, size and cap matched to your chart for each method | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| Preservative right for the program each sample is for | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| Bottle counts, with duplicate and matrix spike volume | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| Trip blanks and field reagent blanks wherever a method needs them | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| A holding time on every bottle, in that program's terms | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| Coolers, labels and custody forms counted | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
| Questions raised where the plan left something open | Filled from your requests | Filled from your requests |
// After a yes
About 30 days on new kit requests
Once your reviewer finds the drafts meet the success criteria, new requests get a draft kit order the same way for about 30 days.
Sample control checks each order before bottle prep starts, and your team still packs, labels and ships every cooler and answers every client question.
Scoring runs all month in the same side-by-side. A second job waits until this one is judged, and it gets its own price.
// What could come next
Possible next jobs, in a likely order
- 01Next
Sampler instructions for the kit
The sheet that tells the sampler which bottle is for what and how to fill it, drafted from the same order for sample control to approve.
- 02Then
Returned coolers against the order
The bottles that came back compared line by line with the kit that went out, for your receiving tech to confirm.
- 03Later
Case narratives
The opening narrative of a data package drafted from QC summaries and corrective action records, for the QA officer to edit and sign.
// One hard limit
It never decides whether a bottle or a preservative is right.
It drafts kit orders from copies of past requests and your own bottle chart, and it lists every open question. It never decides whether a container, preservative or holding time is acceptable for a method, never picks a method for a client, never reports, qualifies or changes a result, never signs anything, never packs or ships a kit, and never contacts a client. Your sample control staff decide what goes in each cooler.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
The range depends on how many kit requests reach sample control in a week, how many methods and programs your bottle chart covers, and how many clients send their own sampling plans.
// Questions
What sample control leads ask about kit orders
Does the AI choose the analytical method?
What if the client doesn't say whether the water is chlorinated?
Can it handle PFAS sampling kits?
Will it ship kits or email the client a bottle list?
Does it check our bottle inventory?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a call with Rob
Bring the requests that took the most phone calls.
A half-hour call with Rob. Tell him your lab and role, roughly how many kits go out in a week, and which programs your clients sample for. Keep client sampling plans to yourself until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
