// Electric motor repair shops · Rewind test reports
Rewind test report packages, assembled from your shop records for your qualified person to review and sign.
The motor is back together and running, and everything the customer's report needs is spread across the winding bench, the balance stand and the test panel. A free AI proof of concept has AI gather those records for 20 to 30 rewinds you've already shipped, fill in the report and list every record that's missing. Your reviewer, the person who knows these reports best, checks each draft against the report you issued.
- Finished rewinds
- 20 to 30
- Test results judged by the AI
- None
- Reports signed by the AI
- None
// The one job
From scattered shop records to one report ready for a signature
A rewind makes its paperwork in pieces. The incoming test data and core loss printouts sit with the shop order. Winding data is on the sheet the winder filled in while taking out the old coils. The balance record comes from the machine shop and final run data from the test panel. Someone in the office gathers all of it, puts it in the form the customer asked for, and chases whatever never got written down before the motor ships.
In the test, AI works from copies of those records and assembles the report: core loss test, winding data and insulation class, resistance and surge test fields, balance record, final run data, and a list of the records it couldn't find. Every value is copied as recorded, with the page it came from. It doesn't judge any result, and nothing gets signed.
for your qualified person
// What makes it hard
Why a test report is harder to gather than it looks
The trade says what a full file holds. ANSI/EASA AR100, the recommended practice for repairing rotating machines, has a shop open a record when each machine arrives and keep it at least three years: nameplate data, electrical tests and mechanical measurements from before and after the repair, original and final winding data, the parts replaced, and the primary cause of failure where it can be found. Its 2025 edition adds that photographs of all sides help when comparing the as-received machine at final inspection. A report can leave out a before value and still look complete, so the draft sets each item against that list and names every gap.
Core loss is a before-and-after record. AR100 wants cores tested before burnout and again after the winding is out, with the results compared, and keeps core temperature to 700 degrees F. Tulsa's Water and Sewer Department caps its burnout at 650 degrees F, wants the figure in watts loss per pound, and asks for a second reading after burnout to confirm the same data as before. The Department of Energy's 1999 model specification has exciting current and watts loss recorded both times at a stated flux density, and holds the second test until the core is cleaned and dried. Pair the wrong two readings and whoever signs is misled, so each value keeps its stage, its unit and its date.
Which tests ran depends on the winding and the buyer. AR100 calls for insulation resistance, surge and winding resistance on stators and wound rotors, insulation resistance before any high-potential test, and every result kept. It recommends a ten-minute polarization index of at least 2.0 for Class B and higher, citing IEEE 43, the recommended practice for insulation resistance, and notes that a random winding may need a 60/30 second ratio instead. Erie County, New York, wants surge comparison before and after the shop test run on a rewind, and before dismantling on anything else. So a blank field can mean nobody ran the test or that it didn't apply. The draft reports which, where your records show it, and never marks a reading good or bad.
Winding data is the part a customer can't check. Tulsa wants wire size, number of turns and cross-sectional area measured off the old winding and put in the final report, with equal or greater wire area in each slot. The Department of Energy's model specification bars changing turns per coil, span or connection without the purchaser's authorization. On insulation, AR100 asks for a system equal to or better than the original, a 1999 guide from the Electrical Apparatus Service Association notes that many shops upgrade from Class B to Class F or H, and Tulsa and Erie County both call for Class H. Temperature sensors may be left out only with the customer's consent, noted in the record. The draft sets old and new side by side and flags any difference without saying which is right.
The last pages carry the signature. AR100 balances to the level the customer names, otherwise to grade G2.5 at 2,500 rpm or slower and G1.0 above that. Erie County asks for dynamic balance from 25 HP up, with any coupling half back where it came from. Tulsa's run list covers no-load current for each phase, bearing temperature, vibration in three directions at both ends, speed and magnetic center, and above 1,000 volts it wants new time-current coordination curves or a certification that the old ones hold. AR100 expects the instruments behind those numbers to be calibrated at least annually, traceable to NIST. Then someone signs: Erie County wants as-found and as-left values reviewed and signed by the shop's engineer or foreman, and AR100 has the person the shop authorizes enter something like OK to ship in the record. Your reviewer, usually that person, checks that every value landed on the right motor and stage and every gap is real. None of this is legal or engineering advice.
// What you send
Finished rewinds, and the reports that went with them
20 to 30 finished rewinds
The shop order file for each motor as it stands, with the report that went out. Include a job that shipped short of a record and one where a customer asked for a correction.
Core, winding and test records
Core loss printouts, winding data sheets, surge and resistance results and test panel logs, in whatever form your team keeps them, handwritten pages included.
Balance and calibration records
Balance stand sheets, final run data and the calibration records for the instruments used on those jobs, so your reviewer can see what each number rests on.
What customers asked for, after the NDA
Any spec, contract or form a customer gave you on what a report must hold. Customer names can be masked, and nobody logs in to your shop system or test equipment. If records can't leave the shop, we build look-alikes with your reviewer. Defense and aerospace jobs stay out.
// Before it starts
Agreed before any record is copied
A report carries your shop's signature to the customer, so the owner sets these down first.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, usually the person who signs reports
- Who signs
- Your qualified person, in the test and live
- Success criteria
- In writing, for values copied, stages matched and gaps listed
- Sample
- Chosen by your reviewer, across sizes and winding types
- Price
- A range for the live job, before anything starts
- NDA
- Signed before any shop record moves
// How it's scored
The report you issued, next to each draft
| Across the same 20 to 30 rewinds | The report you issued | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Core loss before and after, with stage and unit | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
| Winding data, old and new, as recorded | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
| Insulation class and materials, as recorded | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
| Resistance, surge and insulation test fields | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
| Balance record against the level the customer asked for | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
| Final run data from the test panel | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
| Records missing, named, with nothing filled in | Scored on your rewinds | Scored on your rewinds |
// After a yes
About 30 days on rewinds leaving the floor
With your reviewer's yes, each new rewind gets the same assembled report for about 30 days, while there's still time to find a missing record.
A qualified person reviews and signs every report, and nothing reaches a customer on a draft alone.
You'll have a fixed price for those reports in hand before you sign. Any further job is priced on its own, with monthly support after.
// What could come next
Beyond test reports, if you want more
- 01Next
Repair-or-replace quotes
An incoming inspection sheet drafted into a repair quote with a replace option for your service manager to compare.
- 02Then
Customer spec checklists
A buyer's written repair specification turned into a list of what this job must show, before the first test runs.
- 03After that
Warranty repair files
A returned motor's earlier shop orders and test data pulled together for whoever answers the claim.
// One hard limit
It never judges a test result or signs a report.
The test works only on copies. It never touches your shop system, ERP or test equipment, or a live report. It doesn't say whether a reading passed, whether a core is fit to rewind or whether a motor can ship, and it doesn't decide a repair. A qualified person on your team reviews and signs every report.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
What moves the range: rewinds finished each month, how many kinds of record a typical job holds, and how many customers want their own report form.
// Questions
Questions from the test floor
Will the AI sign the report or mark a test as passed?
Our winding data is handwritten on shop sheets. Can it read that?
Some customers want the report on their own form. Does that work?
Does it connect to our test panel or core tester?
Can it tell us whether a rewind meets AR100?
What if a test was never run on a job?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Bring the report that held up a shipment.
Thirty minutes with Rob covering your shop, your role, the job you'd start with and about how many rewinds you finish in a month. Test records and winding data stay in your shop until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
