30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
For CFOs and controllers

// AI for CFOs · Controllers and finance teams

One finance job, tested on periods you already closed, before anything touches the ledger.

For the CFO or controller who owns the close and answers to the auditors. Pick one job your team repeats every week: vendor invoices, overdue receivables, customer billing or the monthly package. We run a free AI proof of concept on copies of 20 to 30 documents from periods you have already closed, after an NDA, with no login to your ERP or your bank, and your reviewer decides whether it passed.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Finance office proof of conceptFree, one job
Scope
One job, one reviewer
Periods
Closed ones only
Entries posted
None in the test
Reviewer
Your controller or AP lead, named by you
System access
None: copies and exports, after an NDA
Price
A range before it starts, fixed before signing

// Who this is for

The people who sign off on the numbers

One desk answers for four things. The CFO or controller owns the close calendar, the controls behind each balance, the audit, and the cash the business runs on. This page is for a company with a real back office: an AP team keying vendor invoices, someone working the aging report, bills that go out on a cycle, and a month-end package built by hand. Any new tool on one of those desks raises the same three questions: what it touches, who approves what it produces, and what the auditors will see.

Controls already have a vocabulary. COSO's internal control framework, refreshed in 2013, sorts every control into five components: the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. Seventeen principles sit under them, and a 2016 COSO and ACFE guide says a system of internal control is effective only when each principle is present, functioning and working with the rest. Principle 8 asks a company to consider the potential for fraud when it assesses risk, which is one reason a new outside party near the payables desk gets a hard look.

Segregation of duties decides where a new tool can sit. The GAO's Green Book, which follows the same five components, describes it as splitting four duties among different people: authorizing a transaction, processing and recording it, reviewing it, and handling the related assets. Where a team is too small for a clean split, it calls for other controls that cover the risk. Our drafts only ever prepare. A person on your team approves, and during the test nothing is recorded at all.

If the company is public, the calendar has a statute behind it. Every SEC issuer puts management's report on internal control over financial reporting in its annual report under Section 404(a). The auditor's attestation under Section 404(b) applies only to accelerated and large accelerated filers, as the SEC's 2010 release on the Dodd-Frank change sets out. Form 10-Q is due 40 days after quarter-end for those two filer types and 45 days for everyone else, and no 10-Q is filed for the fourth quarter. A private company files none of this, so its deadlines come from its owners, its lenders and its auditors.

// Jobs that fit

Finance jobs a controller can test first

Closed periods only
One job at a time

// Inside your controls

Why a closed period is where the test belongs

A test can't change a closed period. Its entries are posted and reviewed, and at many companies already audited. The test reads copies and exports from it and writes nothing back, so it plays no part in any control over that period and leaves nothing for anyone to reverse. The IRS tells most businesses to keep records for three years and employment tax records for at least four, and notes that creditors or an insurer may want them kept longer. The documents the test needs are ones you already hold under that policy, and the originals never leave your files.

Auditors test the review, and the report behind it. A 2013 PCAOB staff alert on audits of internal control lists what makes a management review precise enough to rely on, among them the objective of the review, how far the figures are aggregated, how consistently it runs and the threshold for investigating a difference. It adds that when a control relies on system-generated reports, or on other information the company produces, the auditor should get evidence that the information is complete and accurate. That is why every draft in the test carries its source document, and anything that won't tie is listed instead of forced.

Your reviewer scores it like a control test. Before it starts, you name the reviewer, the person who knows this job best: usually the controller or the AP lead. The success criteria go in writing the way a test of a control would: which totals must tie, which exceptions must be caught, and what counts as a miss. The 20 to 30 documents are not a random sample. Your reviewer picks them, and the hard ones belong in it: credits, partial receipts, short payments and entries your team corrected later.

In the live run, approval stays with your people. After a yes, the job runs for about 30 days on new documents, and a person on your team approves every item before it posts. The draft prepares, your approver approves, and whoever releases payments today keeps doing it. How approved drafts reach your ERP is agreed and priced before you sign, so you can walk your auditors through the design first.

// How it runs

Four steps through the finance office

NDA first
Copies, never logins
  1. Step 01

    One job, closed periods

    Pick one job your team repeats every week and periods that are already closed and reviewed. Every other job waits for a test of its own.

  2. Step 02

    You name the reviewer

    Before any file moves, you name the reviewer, agree the success criteria in writing and get a price range for running the job live. If an owner or a board signs off on spending, they see the same terms.

  3. Step 03

    NDA, then copies and exports

    The NDA is signed first. Your team then sends copies of 20 to 30 documents it already processed, with the entries they became, and no one logs in to your ERP, your bank or your AP tool. If the documents can't leave the building, we build look-alikes with your reviewer.

  4. Step 04

    Scored side by side, then about 30 days live

    Your reviewer lines each draft up against what your team booked. After a yes, the job runs live for about 30 days and a person approves every entry before it posts. The next job is a new decision with its own price.

// One hard limit

It never posts, approves or pays anything, and never changes a control.

Journal entries, invoice approvals, payment runs, vendor master changes, credit holds and the period close all stay with your team. The test doesn't redesign a control, move a duty from one person to another or touch a reconciliation you sign. It gives no accounting or tax advice: how a transaction is recorded is decided by your team, your auditors and your advisers, and a draft only follows the treatment your team already used.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

The range follows volume and difficulty: documents a month, and how many of them are exceptions such as credits, partials or bills with no PO. Monthly support starts once the job is live.

// Questions

What CFOs and controllers ask

What will our auditors make of this?
During the test there is nothing new for them to look at, because it reads copies from closed periods and posts nothing. Before a live run, walk them through the design: the draft prepares, and a person on your team approves every entry before it posts. If your company is an SEC filer, have that conversation before you sign, since management reports on internal control in every annual report.
Will our auditors want a SOC 1 report?
The test itself processes none of your transactions; it reads copies from periods that are already closed. The AICPA describes a SOC 1 report as an examination of a service organization's controls that are likely relevant to its customers' internal control over financial reporting, written for those customers and their auditors. Whether a live run raises that question is for your auditors to say, so ask them before you sign.
Does it break our segregation of duties?
No. In the test it records and approves nothing, so no duty moves. In a live run it prepares drafts, a person on your team approves each one, and whoever releases payments today still does. On a small team where one person both prepares and approves, the draft gives that person something to check against; it never replaces the approval.
How is our data protected?
The NDA is signed before any file moves, and the test works only from copies and exports, with no login to your ERP, your bank, your AP tool or a customer's portal. Strip bank account numbers and anything else you'd rather keep before sending. If the copies must be returned or deleted by a set date, write that into the NDA; if documents can't leave at all, we build look-alikes with your reviewer.
Which ERP or accounting system do you need?
None for the test. CSV or Excel exports and PDF copies from whatever you run are enough, whether that is NetSuite, Business Central, Sage Intacct or an older system on your own server. How approved entries reach your system in the live run is agreed and priced before you sign.
What does it cost?
The proof of concept is free. Before it starts you get a range for running the job live, and after it a fixed price before anything is signed. Monthly support follows once the job is live, and every later job is priced on its own.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof of concept call

Bring one job and a period you've already closed.

Thirty minutes with Rob. Tell him your role, the job you'd test first and about how many of those documents your team handles in a month. Keep every file until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.