Site closeout packages built from the field records, line by line against the customer's list.

A closeout starts with what the crew turned in: photos off a phone, sweep files from the test set, redlines on a drawing set, torque and grounding records, and the lien waivers the office collected. Somewhere there is the customer's written list saying what the package must hold, and often what each photo must show. Someone in the office walks that list, renames files, chases what is missing and builds the package.

For the test, AI reads copies of a finished site's records and drafts the package index: each checklist line, the file that answers it, photos renamed to the wording on the list, test results carried over exactly as supplied, and a separate list of every item on the checklist with nothing behind it. It never decides a result passes and it submits nothing. Your project manager reviews the draft and submits every package.

A public buyer's list reads like a contract. Missouri's highway commission, specifying a 150-foot radio tower near Branson, names its final tower documentation: as-builts if anything changed, a certification that the tower is plumb, coax sweeps, a guide to the cable marking, a grounding resistance report, concrete cylinder results and construction photographs. Conway, Arkansas, in a 2015 addendum, wants at least four sets of as-builts before final acceptance, with the tower maker's engineering documents and the foundation concrete results folded in. Lincoln County, Montana, asked for three sets within fourteen working days plus a legible PDF, and tied final payment to its own inspection. The draft works from the list that came with that site and never carries one customer's line onto another's job.

Some photos only exist once. Missouri's photo list opens with the site grounding before backfilling and the foundation forms and rebar cages before concrete. Leon County, Texas, in a 2026 tower RFP addendum, won't let a trench be backfilled until the county has inspected the grounding, and wants installation photos of tower-mounted lights, control boxes, junction boxes and lightning rods. A shot of a finished antenna can be retaken on the next trip up. A shot of grounding under the backfill can't, so when one is missing the draft puts that line on the open list for someone to deal with.

A sweep only means something with its setup. Missouri asks for a return loss sweep before the final antenna connection is made and a distance-to-fault sweep on the finished installation with the antenna in place, and every result goes to the state for approval before final acceptance. Both sweeps are plotted with distance along the bottom, so to someone opening two files cold they look alike. The draft carries each file as supplied, with its line label, its date and whichever test condition the file states, and leaves every pass or fail to a person.

The engineer may only ever see your photos. Connecticut Siting Council files show why. In one, an engineering firm's desktop review of a mount change says it never visited the site and worked from the contractor's close-out photos. In another, inspectors reported that antennas and radios sat in a different mount position than the drawings showed and that the general contractor had redlined the change. The Council's conditions there called for documentation certified by a Professional Engineer within 45 days of finishing the installation. A redline that never reached the package leaves an engineer staring at a mismatch.

What your reviewer will watch. Conway wants ground resistance reported for the as-installed system with plan drawings showing where it was measured, so a number on a page answers only half the line. Torque and grounding records come through as the crew wrote them, and lien waivers show as present or missing against the checklist, with their legal effect left alone. Did each file land on the right line? Was each photo renamed to the list's wording rather than dropped in as any shot of that sector? Did any test value change on the way over? Is every open item on the open list? None of this is legal or engineering advice.

If your reviewer says yes, the same job runs on sites closing over the next 30 days or so.

A person approves each item before it goes anywhere. Your project manager still reviews the draft and submits every package, by whatever route that customer uses.

Monthly support follows if you continue, and any further job is its own decision at its own price.