30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
Job 03 · Parts department

// Equipment dealers · Parts returns

Core returns and parts credits, followed until the credit shows up.

One job, tried on copies of returns your parts department already shipped. AI follows each core charge and parts return from the parts invoice to the return shipment and the manufacturer's credit memo, and lists every credit that is missing or short for your parts manager. Your reviewer, the person who knows your parts returns best, checks that list against what your team found.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Past returns
20 to 30
Credits disputed for you
None
DMS or portal logins
None

// The one job

A core goes back. Someone has to watch for the credit.

A remanufactured part goes out on a repair order with a core charge on it, and the manufacturer bills your dealership a core charge of its own. The old part comes off the machine and gets drained, tagged and shipped back. Later a credit memo arrives: for the full deposit, for less, or not at all. Surplus stock sent back for credit follows a similar path on a different calendar.

For the test, AI reads copies of that paperwork for returns already closed and builds the trail for each one: the charge, the shipment, the credit and the difference. Nothing is shipped, claimed or posted. Your reviewer lays each trail beside the one your parts team kept.

Parts invoiceFrom the manufacturer
Part no.
Core charge
Invoice date
Order no.
LineQtyCore
Illustration, not a real invoice
Followed
to the credit
Core trailDraft
Return tag
Shipped
Credit memo
Short by
CoreConditionCredit
Illustration, not a real trail

// What makes it hard here

Where core credits leak away

Every core has two deposits. The manufacturer charges your dealership a core charge on the reman part, and you charge your customer one on the counter ticket or repair order. Each comes back only when a core does, in acceptable shape. A customer who never brings the old unit in leaves you holding your own core charge. A core that goes back and draws a short credit leaves the difference with you. The trail shows both sides for every reman part number.

The credit depends on the core's condition, and the maker grades it. One Cat dealer's published core acceptance criteria sort returns into full credit, partial credit and no refund. Full credit needs an acceptable part number and a core that is fully assembled and complete, free of fire damage, heavy rust and torch marks. An engine core must turn its crankshaft through 360 degrees twice one way and once the other after it comes out of the machine, and a cracked block is billed back as a separate charge. John Deere's parts store grades returned cores in three bands too: complete with no visible external damage; visibly damaged, holding more than residual fluid, or an electronic part with a broken tamper seal; and disassembled or damaged by fire or water.

The repair order predicts the credit. The same Cat dealer's criteria tell the inspector to ask the service department or the customer why the part was replaced, because a failed, non-running core earns only partial credit on many components. Some things look like failure and aren't: on hydraulic cylinders, seal leakage and drift count as wear. How the core travels matters as well. It goes back drained, with openings plugged, fastened to the shipping stand it arrived on, and never taken apart to check it. So the trail reads the technician's cause and the return paperwork together, and marks which short credits look explained and which look worth a question.

Stock returns run on their own rules. Surplus parts go back under each manufacturer's return program and your dealer agreement, and some states write rules of their own. Florida's law for outdoor power equipment dealers, for one, requires suppliers to offer a yearly chance to return surplus parts for credit. It excludes obsolete and superseded parts, takes only new, unused parts on the current returnable list, gives the supplier 60 days after the parts arrive to issue credit, and leaves packing and freight to the dealer. A superseded number on a return, or one credit memo covering several returns, is where the matching needs a person.

What your reviewer will watch. Does every core charge on the manufacturer's invoices have a return, or a reason it hasn't gone back? Is every credit memo matched to the shipment and the part it pays for? Is each short credit explained by the inspection result, or flagged? Are customer core charges refunded when their cores came in, and still open when they didn't? And does the list stop at what the paperwork shows, instead of guessing why a credit came up short?

// What you send

Returns your parts team already closed

Copies only
No DMS, no portal
01

20 to 30 returns

Core returns and stock returns from the last few months, each with the parts invoice that carried the charge. Include some that came back short or never came back.

02

The trail behind them

Return tags or forms, shipping papers, the manufacturer's inspection results where you have them, and the credit memos or statements that followed.

03

The customer side

Counter tickets or repair orders that charged your customers a core, and a note of whether each core came back.

04

Nothing connects

We never sign in to your dealer management system or a manufacturer's parts site. Exports and scans are enough, and the NDA is signed before anything moves.

// Before it starts

Decided before any return is copied

The owner settles these in writing before day one.

Before the proof of conceptOwner signs off
Reviewer
Named by the owner, usually the parts manager or a parts accountant
Success criteria
In writing, for example every missing or short credit found
Manufacturer
One line, picked by your reviewer
Price
A range for the live job, before files move
NDA
Signed first

// How the test is judged

Your team's records beside each trail

Return by return
against what your team found
On the same 20 to 30 returnsWhat your team foundThe AI trail
Core charge matched to its return shipmentMeasured on your returnsMeasured on your returns
Credit memo matched to the part and the returnMeasured on your returnsMeasured on your returns
Short credits explained by the core's conditionMeasured on your returnsMeasured on your returns
Cores never returned, with how long each has been outMeasured on your returnsMeasured on your returns
Customer core charges refunded or still open, correctlyMeasured on your returnsMeasured on your returns
Returns that needed a person to dig furtherMeasured on your returnsMeasured on your returns
Empty for now. Nothing goes in a cell until your own returns have been through the test.Your reviewer fills both columns, and their verdict stands.

// After a yes

About 30 days on returns as they ship

After your reviewer says yes, the job follows new core charges and returns for about 30 days.

The missing-credit list goes to your parts manager, who decides what to chase and with whom. No manufacturer or customer hears from the AI, and every refund or write-off is still your team's call.

Any next job waits until those 30 days are done, and starts only if you ask for it.

// Later, one at a time

What could come next

Ideas to weigh with you
Each priced separately
  1. 01

    Warranty claims from repair orders

    Claims drafted from closed repair orders and technician notes, for your warranty administrator to check and file.

    Next
  2. 02

    Parts invoices matched to receipts

    Each manufacturer's parts invoice checked against what was ordered and what arrived, before it is paid.

    Then
  3. 03

    Inspection sheets into service quotes

    A technician's walk-around turned into a repair quote with parts and labor, for a service writer to send.

    After that

// One hard limit

It never refunds a core or disputes a credit.

Customer refunds, write-offs and every question to a manufacturer stay with your parts team. The test reads copies of returns already closed and writes its list for your reviewer, without signing in to your dealer management system or any manufacturer's site.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

Rob gives the range on the call, once he knows roughly how many cores and stock returns go out in a month, and for how many lines.

// Questions

Core return questions

Which manufacturers' core programs can you follow?
One line per test, picked by your reviewer, usually the one you send the most cores to. If you can share that manufacturer's core acceptance rules, include them; if not, your reviewer tells us how its cores are graded.
We track cores in a spreadsheet. Is that enough?
Yes. A spreadsheet, a report from your dealer management system or a folder of tags and credit memos all work. The test needs the charge, the shipment and the credit for each return, in whatever form you keep them.
Will the AI decide which short credits to dispute?
No. It shows each short credit beside the inspection result and the repair order, and marks the ones that look worth a question. Your parts manager decides what to chase.
Does it cover warranty parts returns too?
Not in this test. Failed parts held or shipped back for a warranty claim belong to the warranty job, which has its own page. This one covers core charges and parts sent back for credit.
What about cores our customers never bring back?
They go on the list with how long each has been out and the customer charge that went with it. What to do about them stays with your team.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof of concept call

Start with last quarter's core returns.

A 30-minute call with Rob: your dealership and role, which returns you'd test, and roughly how many cores go back in a month. Keep tags and credit memos with you until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.