// Electrical contractors · The first job
Submittal packages, marked and checked against the spec before your PM signs.
Electrical submittals, tested as a free AI proof of concept on 20 to 30 packages from finished jobs. Each package is rebuilt from the spec section and your suppliers' data, and your reviewer compares it with what your team sent and what the engineer marked.
- Past packages
- 20 to 30
- Substitutions approved
- None
- System access
- None
// The one job
A spec section in. A marked package out, for your PM.
A spec section such as 26 24 16, Panelboards, says what has to be submitted and what the product must meet. Today a project engineer or PM gathers the manufacturer's data, marks the catalog number and options on each cut sheet, checks ratings against the panel schedule, writes up anything that differs, and stamps the package for the GC.
In the proof of concept, AI does the same from copies: it pulls the pages for each item, marks them, checks them against the products and requirements the section lists, and flags each deviation with the paragraph it touches. Nothing goes to the GC.
and checked
// Where it gets hard
What an electrical package has to get right
One package per section, and every page marked. A common MasterSpec version of Section 01 33 00 wants product data collected into one submittal for each type of product, with each copy marked to show which products and options apply. A panelboard or luminaire cut sheet lists a whole family of catalog numbers, so the draft marks the one that matches and the options that go with it. The same section returns partial submittals without review, and the architect won't look at a package that lacks the contractor's approval stamp with the section number, the reviewer's name and the date.
Ratings and listings are where packages fail. Panelboard sections disagree on short-circuit ratings: some require fully rated equipment, some accept a series-rated combination with evidence that a testing laboratory listed it, and some reject series ratings outright. The same section may set hard-drawn copper or tin-plated aluminum bus, call for seismic certification in seismic areas, and require products listed and labeled under NFPA 70 and marked for their location and use. The short-circuit and coordination studies themselves usually sit in their own section, 26 05 73.
Lighting and devices carry their own lists. Under 26 51 19, LED Interior Lighting, product data is arranged in order of the luminaire designations on the drawings, with lumens, color temperature and CRI, photometric data based on IES LM-79 and LM-80 from an NVLAP-accredited lab or an independent agency, and emergency units with their batteries. Under 26 27 26, Wiring Devices, receptacles meet UL 498 and Federal Specification W-C-596, tamper-resistant where NFPA 70 Article 406.12 requires it and weather-resistant in damp or wet locations, and the spec may set red for devices on the essential electrical system.
A deviation is not a substitution, and neither is the AI's call. Under AIA's A201-2017, Section 3.12.8, the architect's approval doesn't relieve the contractor of a deviation unless the contractor specifically flagged it at the time of submittal and it was approved in writing. The MasterSpec procedures say to highlight, encircle or otherwise identify each deviation, and to list them, minor variations included, on a separate sheet on your letterhead. A product from a manufacturer the section names is not a substitution. A different product is, and it goes through Section 01 25 00, often on CSI Form 13.1A; some specs accept substitutions for cause, such as a discontinued product, and none for convenience. The draft builds the deviation sheet; your PM decides the rest.
What your reviewer will watch: the catalog number and options marked on each sheet, ratings below what the drawings show, a missing item that would make the package partial, listed products treated as substitutions or the reverse, and any deviation left off the sheet. AIA's definition of shop drawings includes data a manufacturer, supplier or distributor prepares, so gear drawings from your distributor or rep still go out under your stamp.
// What you send
What the test needs from your project team
20 to 30 past packages
Packages your team sent on finished jobs, each with the returned copy and the engineer's marks. Include a few that came back revise and resubmit.
The spec sections and schedules
The Division 26 sections behind those packages, plus 27 or 28 where they're in your scope, and the panel schedules, luminaire schedule and one-line the packages were checked against.
What your suppliers sent
The cut sheets, gear drawings and quotes from your distributor or reps, the same raw material your team started from.
An NDA first, or look-alikes
Project manuals can carry an owner's confidentiality terms, so the NDA comes first. If documents can't leave the office, we build look-alike packages with your reviewer.
// Before it starts
Settled before the first package moves
The owner decides who judges the packages and what counts as a miss, before day one.
- Reviewer
- Named by the owner. Usually the PM or project engineer who builds packages today.
- Success criteria
- Written down first, including which missed deviations fail it
- Price
- A range for the live job, given up front
- Packages
- Picked by your reviewer, with a few revise-and-resubmits among them
- NDA
- Signed before any project manual moves
// How it's judged
Packages, compared item by item
| Same 20 to 30 packages | What your team sent | The proof of concept |
|---|---|---|
| Right catalog number and options marked | Filled in on your packages | Filled in on your packages |
| Ratings checked against the schedules and one-line | Filled in on your packages | Filled in on your packages |
| Every item the section requires, nothing partial | Filled in on your packages | Filled in on your packages |
| Deviations flagged, with the paragraph they touch | Filled in on your packages | Filled in on your packages |
| Listed products and substitutions told apart | Filled in on your packages | Filled in on your packages |
| Comments the engineer made on the return | Filled in on your packages | Filled in on your packages |
// After a yes
About 30 days on new packages
After your reviewer's yes, the same job runs on new packages from your open jobs for about 30 days.
Your PM approves each package before it goes to the GC, and only your PM decides whether to request a substitution.
The live job carries a fixed price agreed before you sign. Whatever comes next is priced separately, with monthly support once it runs.
// Later, one at a time
What could come next
- 01Next
Change order pricing
Draft change orders from RFI answers, bulletins and revised sheets, with labor from your own units, for your estimator to check.
- 02Then
Material buyout
Distributor quotes for gear, lighting and wire compared against your takeoff and the approved packages, with exclusions and lead times called out.
- 03After that
Closeout manuals
Operation and maintenance data and warranties gathered from the approved packages, section by section, ready for turnover.
// One hard limit
It never approves a substitution.
Whether a different product is acceptable is the architect's or engineer's decision, reached through your GC, and whether to ask is your PM's. The draft marks where a product differs and stops there; it never changes a product to make a package comply. Certified payroll stays out as well, on this job and every later one.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
The range depends on how many open jobs you carry, which divisions are in your scope, and who supplies your gear and lighting data.
// Questions
Submittal questions
Our distributor already puts the gear and lighting packages together. What's left to test?
Will it decide whether a product counts as an equal?
What about switchgear shop drawings from the manufacturer?
How many jobs do 20 to 30 packages need to come from?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof-of-concept call
Test it on packages you already sent.
30 minutes with Rob. The form asks your company and role, the job you want tested, and about how many packages a typical job needs. Hold project manuals and packages until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
