30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call

// Electrical contractors · The first job

Submittal packages, marked and checked against the spec before your PM signs.

Electrical submittals, tested as a free AI proof of concept on 20 to 30 packages from finished jobs. Each package is rebuilt from the spec section and your suppliers' data, and your reviewer compares it with what your team sent and what the engineer marked.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Past packages
20 to 30
Substitutions approved
None
System access
None

// The one job

A spec section in. A marked package out, for your PM.

A spec section such as 26 24 16, Panelboards, says what has to be submitted and what the product must meet. Today a project engineer or PM gathers the manufacturer's data, marks the catalog number and options on each cut sheet, checks ratings against the panel schedule, writes up anything that differs, and stamps the package for the GC.

In the proof of concept, AI does the same from copies: it pulls the pages for each item, marks them, checks them against the products and requirements the section lists, and flags each deviation with the paragraph it touches. Nothing goes to the GC.

Spec sectionDivision 26 excerpt
Action submittals
Manufacturers
Short-circuit rating
Bus material
ParagraphRequirementApplies to
Illustration, not your project manual
Pulled, marked
and checked
Submittal packageDraft
Transmittal
Spec section
Sheets marked
Deviations
ItemCatalog no.Complies
Illustration, not a real package

// Where it gets hard

What an electrical package has to get right

One package per section, and every page marked. A common MasterSpec version of Section 01 33 00 wants product data collected into one submittal for each type of product, with each copy marked to show which products and options apply. A panelboard or luminaire cut sheet lists a whole family of catalog numbers, so the draft marks the one that matches and the options that go with it. The same section returns partial submittals without review, and the architect won't look at a package that lacks the contractor's approval stamp with the section number, the reviewer's name and the date.

Ratings and listings are where packages fail. Panelboard sections disagree on short-circuit ratings: some require fully rated equipment, some accept a series-rated combination with evidence that a testing laboratory listed it, and some reject series ratings outright. The same section may set hard-drawn copper or tin-plated aluminum bus, call for seismic certification in seismic areas, and require products listed and labeled under NFPA 70 and marked for their location and use. The short-circuit and coordination studies themselves usually sit in their own section, 26 05 73.

Lighting and devices carry their own lists. Under 26 51 19, LED Interior Lighting, product data is arranged in order of the luminaire designations on the drawings, with lumens, color temperature and CRI, photometric data based on IES LM-79 and LM-80 from an NVLAP-accredited lab or an independent agency, and emergency units with their batteries. Under 26 27 26, Wiring Devices, receptacles meet UL 498 and Federal Specification W-C-596, tamper-resistant where NFPA 70 Article 406.12 requires it and weather-resistant in damp or wet locations, and the spec may set red for devices on the essential electrical system.

A deviation is not a substitution, and neither is the AI's call. Under AIA's A201-2017, Section 3.12.8, the architect's approval doesn't relieve the contractor of a deviation unless the contractor specifically flagged it at the time of submittal and it was approved in writing. The MasterSpec procedures say to highlight, encircle or otherwise identify each deviation, and to list them, minor variations included, on a separate sheet on your letterhead. A product from a manufacturer the section names is not a substitution. A different product is, and it goes through Section 01 25 00, often on CSI Form 13.1A; some specs accept substitutions for cause, such as a discontinued product, and none for convenience. The draft builds the deviation sheet; your PM decides the rest.

What your reviewer will watch: the catalog number and options marked on each sheet, ratings below what the drawings show, a missing item that would make the package partial, listed products treated as substitutions or the reverse, and any deviation left off the sheet. AIA's definition of shop drawings includes data a manufacturer, supplier or distributor prepares, so gear drawings from your distributor or rep still go out under your stamp.

// What you send

What the test needs from your project team

Finished jobs
Copies only
01

20 to 30 past packages

Packages your team sent on finished jobs, each with the returned copy and the engineer's marks. Include a few that came back revise and resubmit.

02

The spec sections and schedules

The Division 26 sections behind those packages, plus 27 or 28 where they're in your scope, and the panel schedules, luminaire schedule and one-line the packages were checked against.

03

What your suppliers sent

The cut sheets, gear drawings and quotes from your distributor or reps, the same raw material your team started from.

04

An NDA first, or look-alikes

Project manuals can carry an owner's confidentiality terms, so the NDA comes first. If documents can't leave the office, we build look-alike packages with your reviewer.

// Before it starts

Settled before the first package moves

The owner decides who judges the packages and what counts as a miss, before day one.

Agreed up frontOwner signs off
Reviewer
Named by the owner. Usually the PM or project engineer who builds packages today.
Success criteria
Written down first, including which missed deviations fail it
Price
A range for the live job, given up front
Packages
Picked by your reviewer, with a few revise-and-resubmits among them
NDA
Signed before any project manual moves

// How it's judged

Packages, compared item by item

Your package beside ours
with the engineer's marks
Same 20 to 30 packagesWhat your team sentThe proof of concept
Right catalog number and options markedFilled in on your packagesFilled in on your packages
Ratings checked against the schedules and one-lineFilled in on your packagesFilled in on your packages
Every item the section requires, nothing partialFilled in on your packagesFilled in on your packages
Deviations flagged, with the paragraph they touchFilled in on your packagesFilled in on your packages
Listed products and substitutions told apartFilled in on your packagesFilled in on your packages
Comments the engineer made on the returnFilled in on your packagesFilled in on your packages
Empty until it runs. No cell is filled until your own past packages have been rebuilt.Your reviewer scores them against the criteria agreed first.

// After a yes

About 30 days on new packages

After your reviewer's yes, the same job runs on new packages from your open jobs for about 30 days.

Your PM approves each package before it goes to the GC, and only your PM decides whether to request a substitution.

The live job carries a fixed price agreed before you sign. Whatever comes next is priced separately, with monthly support once it runs.

// Later, one at a time

What could come next

Possibilities, ranked
Each after its own yes
  1. 01

    Change order pricing

    Draft change orders from RFI answers, bulletins and revised sheets, with labor from your own units, for your estimator to check.

    Next
  2. 02

    Material buyout

    Distributor quotes for gear, lighting and wire compared against your takeoff and the approved packages, with exclusions and lead times called out.

    Then
  3. 03

    Closeout manuals

    Operation and maintenance data and warranties gathered from the approved packages, section by section, ready for turnover.

    After that

// One hard limit

It never approves a substitution.

Whether a different product is acceptable is the architect's or engineer's decision, reached through your GC, and whether to ask is your PM's. The draft marks where a product differs and stops there; it never changes a product to make a package comply. Certified payroll stays out as well, on this job and every later one.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

The range depends on how many open jobs you carry, which divisions are in your scope, and who supplies your gear and lighting data.

// Questions

Submittal questions

Our distributor already puts the gear and lighting packages together. What's left to test?
The check before your stamp. Your approval says the package was reviewed against the contract documents, so the test compares what the distributor or rep sent with the spec, marks the gaps and lists deviations for your PM.
Will it decide whether a product counts as an equal?
No. It shows whether the manufacturer is one the section names and where the product differs from the requirements. Whether that is acceptable is up to the architect or engineer, and whether to ask is up to your PM.
What about switchgear shop drawings from the manufacturer?
Send some. The test checks a manufacturer's drawings against the spec, the one-line and the ratings shown on the drawings. It doesn't draw them, and it doesn't replace the power system studies a spec may require.
How many jobs do 20 to 30 packages need to come from?
It depends on job size, since each product section makes its own package. Your reviewer picks the set, and a mix of gear, lighting and devices tests more than a stack of one kind.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof-of-concept call

Test it on packages you already sent.

30 minutes with Rob. The form asks your company and role, the job you want tested, and about how many packages a typical job needs. Hold project manuals and packages until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.