// Distributors · Add-on orders
Orders from an add-on on another ERP, brought into one order flow.
You bought a distributor, and its customers still send POs to its inbox, numbered and priced in its own system. A free AI proof of concept takes copies of 20 to 30 orders the add-on already keyed and has AI redraft them in your format, with your item numbers. Your reviewer, the person who knows both catalogs best, checks each one. Neither ERP is touched.
- Add-on POs
- 20 to 30
- Systems we log in to
- Neither
- Works from
- Copies and exports
// The one job
Two catalogs, one order desk
Until its migration, an add-on runs its own ERP. Its customers keep emailing POs to the same people, who key them into the old system with the old item numbers, while the platform wants every order handled one way.
The job is to read each of those POs once and draft the order the way the platform keeps it: your account, your item numbers, your units and the right branch, with the add-on's own item number shown beside each line.
Nothing is entered anywhere during the test. The drafts sit next to the orders the add-on's team actually keyed, so your reviewer checks every line against real work.
the platform's format
// Why it's harder
Where two item files disagree
Why this job exists. Platforms in distribution grow by buying. KSM, an accounting and advisory firm, counted 75 distribution deals in the second quarter of 2026 and said add-ons drove the private equity side. Each add-on arrives with its own customers, item file and often ERP: say, an Eclipse shop joining a Prophet 21 platform.
One product, three numbers. The same product carries one item number in each system, and the customer's part number may match neither. The add-on may stock it by the each where you stock it by the box, or still carry a number you superseded years ago. The manufacturer's part number is often the only thing both files share, and even that is typed differently: with or without dashes, with a prefix, or with a pack size on the end. A line is right only when all three numbers point to one product at one unit.
Shared customers. A contractor who bought from both companies before the deal now has two account numbers, two ship-to lists and two sets of contract prices. Which account an order lands on, and which price holds, is a decision your team has probably made but rarely written down. In this test it goes into the success criteria before any draft is judged.
The add-on still ships it. Branch codes, tax setup and freight terms differ between the two companies. A will-call order is still picked at the add-on's counter, and a drop-ship line still goes to the add-on's vendor until purchasing is combined. So each draft keeps the add-on's fulfillment details, even when the item and account are in your terms.
Who reviews. The best reviewer knows both catalogs: often the add-on's longest-serving inside salesperson, working with the platform's integration lead. On each line they check that the draft says what the add-on's team keyed, and that the add-on's item maps to the right one of yours. Every confirmed match can carry into your cross-reference or migration file.
// What you send
Exports from each company
20 to 30 add-on orders
POs the add-on received, each with the sales order its team keyed. Include customers who buy from both companies.
Both item lists
A spreadsheet export from each ERP: item numbers, manufacturer part numbers, descriptions and units. Add any mapping your integration team has already started.
Your order format
A few of the platform's own sales orders, or a blank export, so the drafts come out in the layout and codes your team uses.
One NDA for both
The NDA comes before the first file and covers documents from both companies. The test never logs in to either ERP. If files must stay inside, we build look-alikes with your reviewer.
// Before it starts
Agreed up front, across both companies
Integration has more owners than one order desk, so these are settled first.
- Your reviewer
- Someone who knows both catalogs, named by the owner
- Success criteria
- Written and agreed, including which account and price win for shared customers
- Output
- The platform's order layout and codes
- Price
- A range for the live run on the add-on
- NDA
- Signed first, covering both companies' files
// How it's judged
Each add-on order, checked twice
| On the same 20 to 30 add-on POs | As the add-on keyed it | The AI draft |
|---|---|---|
| Account chosen, where both companies sell to the customer | Filled in on your orders | Filled in on your orders |
| Add-on item mapped to your item number | Filled in on your orders | Filled in on your orders |
| Units converted between the two item files | Filled in on your orders | Filled in on your orders |
| Price and terms the add-on's team applied | Filled in on your orders | Filled in on your orders |
| Branch, will-call and drop-ship details kept | Filled in on your orders | Filled in on your orders |
| Lines with no match in your catalog, flagged | Filled in on your orders | Filled in on your orders |
// After a yes
The add-on's new orders, for about 30 days
When your reviewer says yes against the success criteria, the same job runs on the add-on's incoming POs for about 30 days.
A person approves every draft before it posts to the ERP that ships it. How an approved order gets there, whether keyed, imported from a file or sent through a connection you already have, is agreed and priced before you sign.
The item matches your reviewer confirms carry forward. When the add-on moves onto your ERP, those lines are already checked.
// What could come next
Possible next jobs, ranked
- 01Next
The platform's own order desk
The same sales order automation on POs your original company receives, in its own ERP.
- 02Then
Quote requests at the add-on
Price requests from the add-on's accounts, answered in draft from your catalog for a salesperson to send.
- 03After that
Overdue invoices across both ledgers
Reminders drafted from each company's aging report, approved one at a time.
- 04When the next deal closes
The next add-on
The same job for the next company you buy, starting from the item matches already confirmed.
// Across industries
The same job in other industries
// One hard limit
We don't connect your two ERPs.
The proof of concept works only on files exported from each system. It does not link the add-on's ERP to yours, sync records between them or stand in for a migration. It shows, line by line, whether the add-on's orders can be drafted correctly in your terms.
Priced as its own job. You see a range before the test and sign only on a fixed price.
The range depends on the add-on's monthly PO count, how far apart the two item files are, and how approved orders will reach the ERP that ships them.
// Questions
Questions from integration teams
Does this replace our ERP migration?
We haven't mapped the two item files yet. Can we still test?
Which ERPs does this work with?
Should the reviewer come from the platform or the add-on?
Can we test several add-ons at once?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a call with Rob
Start with the add-on's order inbox.
Thirty minutes with Rob. Expect three questions: your company and role, which add-on's orders to test, and how many POs that company handles in a month. No files until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
