30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
Job 02 · After an acquisition

// Distributors · Add-on orders

Orders from an add-on on another ERP, brought into one order flow.

You bought a distributor, and its customers still send POs to its inbox, numbered and priced in its own system. A free AI proof of concept takes copies of 20 to 30 orders the add-on already keyed and has AI redraft them in your format, with your item numbers. Your reviewer, the person who knows both catalogs best, checks each one. Neither ERP is touched.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Add-on POs
20 to 30
Systems we log in to
Neither
Works from
Copies and exports

// The one job

Two catalogs, one order desk

Until its migration, an add-on runs its own ERP. Its customers keep emailing POs to the same people, who key them into the old system with the old item numbers, while the platform wants every order handled one way.

The job is to read each of those POs once and draft the order the way the platform keeps it: your account, your item numbers, your units and the right branch, with the add-on's own item number shown beside each line.

Nothing is entered anywhere during the test. The drafts sit next to the orders the add-on's team actually keyed, so your reviewer checks every line against real work.

Customer POSent to the add-on
PO no.
Add-on acct.
Ship to
Need by
Their part no.QtyPrice
Sample layout, not a customer's PO
Drafted in
the platform's format
Draft orderPlatform format
Platform acct.
Cust. PO
Branch
Requested
Your item no.Add-on item no.Qty, UOM
Sample layout, not a live order

// Why it's harder

Where two item files disagree

Why this job exists. Platforms in distribution grow by buying. KSM, an accounting and advisory firm, counted 75 distribution deals in the second quarter of 2026 and said add-ons drove the private equity side. Each add-on arrives with its own customers, item file and often ERP: say, an Eclipse shop joining a Prophet 21 platform.

One product, three numbers. The same product carries one item number in each system, and the customer's part number may match neither. The add-on may stock it by the each where you stock it by the box, or still carry a number you superseded years ago. The manufacturer's part number is often the only thing both files share, and even that is typed differently: with or without dashes, with a prefix, or with a pack size on the end. A line is right only when all three numbers point to one product at one unit.

Shared customers. A contractor who bought from both companies before the deal now has two account numbers, two ship-to lists and two sets of contract prices. Which account an order lands on, and which price holds, is a decision your team has probably made but rarely written down. In this test it goes into the success criteria before any draft is judged.

The add-on still ships it. Branch codes, tax setup and freight terms differ between the two companies. A will-call order is still picked at the add-on's counter, and a drop-ship line still goes to the add-on's vendor until purchasing is combined. So each draft keeps the add-on's fulfillment details, even when the item and account are in your terms.

Who reviews. The best reviewer knows both catalogs: often the add-on's longest-serving inside salesperson, working with the platform's integration lead. On each line they check that the draft says what the add-on's team keyed, and that the add-on's item maps to the right one of yours. Every confirmed match can carry into your cross-reference or migration file.

// What you send

Exports from each company

Exports only
No link between ERPs
01

20 to 30 add-on orders

POs the add-on received, each with the sales order its team keyed. Include customers who buy from both companies.

02

Both item lists

A spreadsheet export from each ERP: item numbers, manufacturer part numbers, descriptions and units. Add any mapping your integration team has already started.

03

Your order format

A few of the platform's own sales orders, or a blank export, so the drafts come out in the layout and codes your team uses.

04

One NDA for both

The NDA comes before the first file and covers documents from both companies. The test never logs in to either ERP. If files must stay inside, we build look-alikes with your reviewer.

// Before it starts

Agreed up front, across both companies

Integration has more owners than one order desk, so these are settled first.

Before any file movesPlatform owner signs off
Your reviewer
Someone who knows both catalogs, named by the owner
Success criteria
Written and agreed, including which account and price win for shared customers
Output
The platform's order layout and codes
Price
A range for the live run on the add-on
NDA
Signed first, covering both companies' files

// How it's judged

Each add-on order, checked twice

Against what the add-on keyed
and against your catalog
On the same 20 to 30 add-on POsAs the add-on keyed itThe AI draft
Account chosen, where both companies sell to the customerFilled in on your ordersFilled in on your orders
Add-on item mapped to your item numberFilled in on your ordersFilled in on your orders
Units converted between the two item filesFilled in on your ordersFilled in on your orders
Price and terms the add-on's team appliedFilled in on your ordersFilled in on your orders
Branch, will-call and drop-ship details keptFilled in on your ordersFilled in on your orders
Lines with no match in your catalog, flaggedFilled in on your ordersFilled in on your orders
No numbers yet. The cells stay empty until the add-on's own POs have been through the test.Your reviewer marks every line and has the final say.

// After a yes

The add-on's new orders, for about 30 days

When your reviewer says yes against the success criteria, the same job runs on the add-on's incoming POs for about 30 days.

A person approves every draft before it posts to the ERP that ships it. How an approved order gets there, whether keyed, imported from a file or sent through a connection you already have, is agreed and priced before you sign.

The item matches your reviewer confirms carry forward. When the add-on moves onto your ERP, those lines are already checked.

// What could come next

Possible next jobs, ranked

Ideas, ranked
Each its own job
  1. 01

    The platform's own order desk

    The same sales order automation on POs your original company receives, in its own ERP.

    Next
  2. 02

    Quote requests at the add-on

    Price requests from the add-on's accounts, answered in draft from your catalog for a salesperson to send.

    Then
  3. 03

    Overdue invoices across both ledgers

    Reminders drafted from each company's aging report, approved one at a time.

    After that
  4. 04

    The next add-on

    The same job for the next company you buy, starting from the item matches already confirmed.

    When the next deal closes

// One hard limit

We don't connect your two ERPs.

The proof of concept works only on files exported from each system. It does not link the add-on's ERP to yours, sync records between them or stand in for a migration. It shows, line by line, whether the add-on's orders can be drafted correctly in your terms.

Priced as its own job. You see a range before the test and sign only on a fixed price.

The range depends on the add-on's monthly PO count, how far apart the two item files are, and how approved orders will reach the ERP that ships them.

// Questions

Questions from integration teams

Does this replace our ERP migration?
No. The migration still happens on your schedule. This job covers the months before it, when add-on orders still arrive in the old format, and the item matches your reviewer confirms can feed the migration file.
We haven't mapped the two item files yet. Can we still test?
Yes. The draft proposes a match for each add-on item from the manufacturer part number and description, and marks it unconfirmed. Your reviewer confirms or corrects each one, which is mapping work your team would have to do anyway.
Which ERPs does this work with?
For the test, any ERP that can export orders and items to a spreadsheet, since we never connect to either. For the live run, how each system takes orders today is built into the fixed price before you sign.
Should the reviewer come from the platform or the add-on?
Usually both take part, with one named reviewer whose call decides. The add-on's senior inside salesperson knows its customers and catalog. Someone on the platform side knows your item file and account rules.
Can we test several add-ons at once?
One at a time. Each add-on has its own catalog, customers and ERP, so each is its own job with its own test, success criteria and price.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a call with Rob

Start with the add-on's order inbox.

Thirty minutes with Rob. Expect three questions: your company and role, which add-on's orders to test, and how many POs that company handles in a month. No files until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.