// Chemical distributors · Incoming COA checks
Incoming COA checks: every producer certificate read before the lot is allocated.
A tote of solvent pulls in with the producer's certificate of analysis. Before it fills an order, someone checks that certificate against your purchase order, your purchase spec and the limits of each customer waiting on that product. In a free AI proof of concept, AI repeats that check on copies of 20 to 30 lots you already received, listing every miss for the person who releases the lot. Your reviewer, the person on your team who knows your receiving and quality files best, sets each check beside what your team decided. The AI never releases, holds or rejects a lot.
- Lots tested
- 20 to 30, already received
- Lots released or rejected by AI
- None
- First step
- An NDA, then copies
// The one job
From a producer's certificate to a check sheet for the person who releases lots
The certificate shows up by email ahead of the truck, in a sleeve taped to a drum, or in a producer's portal days later. Someone ties it to the purchase order and the receipt, reads every result against your item spec, then pulls up the open orders for that product and reads the same results against each customer's spec. A lot that suits one account and misses another has to be allocated with care, or held.
For the test, AI reads copies of those certificates with the POs, receiving records and specs behind them and writes one check sheet per lot: what matched, what didn't, which waiting customers the results fit and which they miss. It allocates nothing and clears nothing. A value it couldn't read or a document it couldn't match goes on the sheet for a person, with the reason.
PO, spec and open orders
// The hard parts
Why a genuine certificate can still hold up a lot
Some customers can lean only on a certificate that shows its work. FDA's rule for dietary supplement makers lets them rely on a supplier's certificate of analysis to confirm a component other than a dietary ingredient only if the certificate describes the test methods, the limits and the actual results, the supplier was first qualified by confirming its results, the certificate is re-confirmed from time to time, and quality control approves the basis. Drug makers meet a similar bar in 21 CFR 211.84: a supplier's report of analysis stands in for full testing only with at least one specific identity test of their own and periodic validation of the supplier's results. A certificate that prints "conforms" beside a test, with no number and no method, gives those accounts nothing to lean on, so the sheet marks each such result and names the customers whose specs want numbers.
Dates are part of the result. A certificate may carry an expiry date, a retest date or only a date of manufacture. ICH Q7, the GMP guide for active pharmaceutical ingredients, says a retest date is the common practice there rather than an expiration date, and that a repacker moving material into a different type of container should run stability studies to support the date it assigns. Some products change on the shelf: one producer's published sheet for acrylic acid gives its dimer limit ex works, warns that dimer keeps forming in storage at room temperature, and says the product stays within specification for one month after delivery. The check sheet sets each lot's dates against the ship dates of the orders waiting on it and marks any lot that would age past a limit before it leaves.
A certificate you reissue carries the producer's with it. When you repack or retest a lot and issue your own certificate, the trail has to show where each number came from. ICH Q7 asks that a certificate reissued by a repacker, agent or broker give the name, address and phone number of the laboratory that ran the analysis, refer to the original manufacturer and its batch certificate, and attach a copy of that certificate. It also expects every certificate to be dated and signed by authorized quality staff. Its chapter for distributors has them keep the PO, bill of lading, receipt, manufacturer's batch number and every authentic certificate. The sheet keeps the producer's batch number beside your own lot number and marks any reissued certificate that has lost the link.
A grade on the PO is a spec of its own. An order for ACS reagent grade points at the American Chemical Society's Reagent Chemicals: a product may be labeled and sold as ACS Reagent Grade only when it meets those purity specifications by ACS-approved methods, ACS has said the monographs are updated twice a year, and the online edition is the version of record. A customer may also want an outside lab's result, and a lab accredited to ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, reports under that standard. The sheet compares the grade and the methods printed on the certificate with what the PO and each customer's spec name, and treats a near match as a miss.
What your reviewer watches for. Usually the quality manager or whoever releases lots today. They check that each sheet tied the certificate to the right PO, receipt and producer batch, that every limit came from the right spec revision, yours or a customer's, that a less-than value was judged honestly against its limit, and that no lot was shown as fit for a customer whose spec it misses.
// What you send
Copies from receiving and the quality file
20 to 30 received lots
Producer certificates for lots already in, each with its PO, the receiving record or bill of lading, and what your team did: released, held, retested or sent back. Add a bulk load and a lot that sat past its retest date.
The specs that applied then
Your item or purchase specs, plus the specs of the customers who had open orders for those products at the time, at the revision in force on the day each lot arrived.
Your release rules
Who may release a lot, which missing items always mean a hold, which producers you still spot-test, and how a lot that suits only some customers gets allocated.
An NDA, then copies
The NDA is signed before any certificate moves. We never sign in to your ERP, your quality system or a producer's portal. Customer names can be masked, and records that can't leave the building become look-alikes built with your reviewer.
// Before it starts
Agreed in writing before the first certificate is copied
A lot cleared by mistake ends up in a customer's tank, so the owner sets these terms first.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, often the quality manager or whoever releases lots
- Checks in scope
- PO and receipt match, item spec, customer specs, dates and signer, or a subset
- Success criteria
- Written and agreed, including how a missed or a needless mark is scored
- Sample
- Picked by your reviewer, with a held lot and a reissued certificate in it
- Release and allocation
- Stay with your people, during the test and live
- Price
- A range for running the checks live
// How it's judged
Each check sheet beside what your team decided
| On the same 20 to 30 lots | What your team decided | The AI check sheet |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate tied to the PO, the receipt and the producer batch | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
| Grade and test methods compared with the PO and the specs | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
| Every result read against your item spec | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
| Waiting customers the lot fits, and the ones it misses | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
| Expiry, retest and manufacture dates set against waiting orders | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
| Signer, issuing lab and any reissued certificate traced to the producer | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
| Lots marked for a person, and why | Marked on your lots | Marked on your lots |
// After a yes
About 30 days on lots as they arrive
When your reviewer says yes against the success criteria, every certificate that comes in gets a check sheet for about 30 days.
Your quality lead still releases every lot and makes every allocation, and a lot the sheet marks stays where your rules put it until a person clears it. A customer's revised spec joins the checks only after your team approves it.
Whatever comes after is a separate decision with a separate price.
// What could come next
Possible next jobs, in order
- 01Next
SDS, COA and statement requests
Customer document requests answered from your approved files, with the certificate for the lot that actually shipped.
- 02Then
Missing certificate follow-ups
Lots still waiting on a certificate or a corrected one, listed each morning with a request drafted for your buyer to send.
- 03After that
Customer quality questionnaires
Supplier surveys drafted from your approved policies and documents, for your quality manager to finish and sign.
// One hard limit
The AI never releases, holds or rejects a lot.
Its check sheet lists what matched and what didn't, and stops there. Releasing, holding, rejecting or allocating a lot, signing or sending a certificate, deciding whether a material meets a rule, and asking a producer or telling a customer anything all stay with qualified people on your team. The test works only from copies of lots already received, and nothing on this page is legal or regulatory advice.
Incoming COA checks are priced as a job of their own: a range before the proof of concept, a fixed price before you sign.
What moves the range: how many lots you receive a month, how many producers and grades they come from, and how many customer specs each lot is read against.
// Questions
What receiving and quality teams ask
Will it release lots for us?
Our certificates arrive as scans, portal downloads and emailed PDFs. Does that matter?
Can it handle a lot that suits one customer and not another?
Do we still need to test lots ourselves?
Is this regulatory advice on what our customers' rules require?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a call with Rob
Bring the last lot you had to hold.
A 30-minute call with Rob: your company and role, whether incoming checks are the right first job, and about how many lots arrive each month. Hold certificates and specs back until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
