// Meat and poultry processors · Pre-shipment review
HACCP pre-shipment review packets, assembled lot by lot for the person who signs.
The truck is booked and the lot's records are still on clipboards in four rooms. Someone trained has to gather them, read them against the plan, and date and sign the review before that product goes anywhere. In a free AI proof of concept, AI assembles the packet from copies of 20 to 30 lots you already shipped. Your reviewer, the person on your team who knows pre-shipment review best, compares each packet with the review your plant actually signed.
- Shipped lots
- 20 to 30
- Lots it approves
- None
- Records it signs
- None
// The one job
A lot's sheets go in. An unsigned packet comes out.
A lot of smoked sausage or sliced deli meat leaves a long trail: batch sheets, cook and chill logs, metal detection checks, thermometer calibrations, a supervisor's direct observations, perhaps a corrective action from second shift. Different people keep those sheets in different rooms. Before anything ships, someone pulls them together, reads each one against the HACCP plan, chases whatever is blank and signs.
For the test, AI reads copies of those records for lots your team already shipped and assembles the review packet: lot and date, the plan and revision that applied, monitoring and verification sheets by critical control point, corrective action entries, and a list of every sheet missing, blank or outside the plan's stated limit. The reviewer, date and signature lines stay empty, and the packet never says a lot can ship.
critical control point
// What makes it hard
What a signature on a pre-shipment review has to stand behind
The rule says what the review has to establish. Under 9 CFR 417.5(c), before a product ships the plant reviews the records of its production for completeness, including that every critical limit was met and that any corrective action was taken, with proper disposition of the product. Where practicable the reviewer did not make those records and is preferably someone trained under 417.7 or the responsible establishment official, defined as the person with overall authority on site or someone above them. That training has to include a segment on record review. So the packet lists whose initials appear on each sheet, and your reviewer sees at a glance whether the person about to sign also made an entry.
A sheet can be full and still fall short. Monitoring records carry the actual times, temperatures or other values the plan prescribes, along with instrument calibration, verification results and the product code, name or lot. Each entry is made when the event happens, with its date and time, and initialed or signed by the employee who made it. North Carolina's meat and poultry inspection program publishes a summary of the HACCP verification task that turns those duties into questions, and its step eight asks whether the final review was documented, signed and dated. The packet asks the same questions of every sheet: a value where the plan wants one, a time, initials. A check mark where the plan wants a number goes on the list.
Corrective action entries have parts. When a critical limit is missed, 9 CFR 417.3(a) expects the cause identified and eliminated, the critical control point back under control, measures against a repeat, and no injurious or adulterated product in commerce. If the plan names no action for that deviation, or a hazard nobody foresaw turns up, 417.3(b) adds segregating and holding the affected product, reviewing whether it can be distributed, and reassessment by a trained person. The packet sets each entry beside those parts and repeats what the entry says happened to the product. Whether the action was adequate stays with your HACCP person.
An open agency sample changes what the signature means. USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) said in its 2012 test-and-hold notice that completing pre-shipment review signals the plant takes full and final responsibility for applying its HACCP controls to that product, and that a plant which finishes the review with results pending, and then gets a positive, has shipped adulterated product. Product may move off site while results are pending only under the plant's own controls, with the review left incomplete and ownership unchanged, and FSIS treats a change of ownership as entry into commerce. A lot with an agency sample on its records goes to the top of the packet, with the sample noted and the review lines left open.
Neighboring records run on different clocks. Sanitation SOP records under 9 CFR 416.16 are daily, initialed and dated by the responsible employee, held at the plant for 48 hours after completion and kept at least six months. Where Listeria measures sit in a prerequisite program other than the Sanitation SOP, part 430 pulls that program and its results into the records 417.5 requires. HACCP monitoring records for refrigerated product stay at least one year; for frozen, preserved or shelf-stable product, at least two, and they may go off site after six months if they can come back within 24 hours of an FSIS request. Your reviewer, usually the HACCP coordinator or quality manager, watches for the right plan revision, lot codes that tie across sheets, and every blank caught. This describes public rules in general terms and is not legal or regulatory advice.
// What you send
Lots your plant already reviewed and shipped
20 to 30 shipped lots
Every sheet for each lot, as it came off the floor: monitoring, verification, calibration and corrective action entries. Include a lot with a deviation and one your reviewer had to send back for a missing entry.
The plans in force
The HACCP plan and revision that applied to each lot, with its flow chart and product list. A critical limit can only be checked against the plan of that day.
The reviews your team signed
The pre-shipment review for each lot, exactly as dated and signed, plus any written procedure for how your plant does it. Each draft gets compared with those.
Copies, after the NDA
The NDA comes before any sheet moves. No one signs in to your plant system or an inspection system. Records that can't leave the building become look-alikes built with your reviewer.
// Before it starts
Agreed before the first sheet is copied
The owner and your reviewer put these in writing.
- Your reviewer
- Named by the owner, often the HACCP coordinator or quality manager
- Success criteria
- Written down: which sheets, blanks, limits and open items each packet must catch
- Lots
- Picked by your reviewer, across products and plans, with at least one deviation
- Signature
- Every review stays with your trained HACCP person
- Price
- A range for live packets, given before any record is shared
- NDA
- Signed first
// How the test is judged
The review your plant signed, beside each packet
| On the same 20 to 30 lots | The review your team signed | The AI packet |
|---|---|---|
| Lot, product code and date tied across every sheet | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
| Right HACCP plan and revision for the product | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
| Sheets present for every critical control point | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
| Blank fields, missing times and missing initials listed | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
| Recorded values set beside the plan's stated limit | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
| Corrective action entries read against each required part | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
| Open agency samples and held product at the top | Filled in on your lots | Filled in on your lots |
// After a yes
About 30 days on lots as they finish
When your reviewer says yes against the success criteria, each new lot gets a packet the same way for about 30 days.
Your trained HACCP person reads every packet, dates it and signs it, and shipping waits for that signature exactly as it does today. What happens to any product stays their call.
The side-by-side check goes on during that month, and another job starts only if you decide on one.
// Later, one at a time
What could follow review packets
- 01Next
Customer specification letters
Supplier questionnaires and spec requests read into a draft response from your own documents, for your quality manager to send.
- 02Then
Listeria hold-and-test lot files
Food contact surface results, held lots and each lot's test or rework record pulled together by line and date.
- 03After that
Annual reassessment files
A year of deviations, plan changes and supporting documents gathered for the trained person who reassesses the plan.
// One hard limit
It never approves a lot or signs a record.
A packet lists what your records say and where they fall short. The proof of concept never touches your plant system, an inspection system or a live lot. It never approves a lot for shipment, decides a corrective action or a product's disposition, and never signs or initials a record. A trained HACCP person signs every pre-shipment review, and nothing here is legal or regulatory advice.
Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.
Rob gives the range on the call, once he knows how many lots you ship in a week, how many HACCP plans they fall under, and whether your sheets are paper or electronic.
// Questions
Pre-shipment review questions
Will it tell us a lot is cleared to ship?
We keep some records on paper and some in spreadsheets. Does that matter?
What if the only trained person at our plant also filled in the sheets?
Do Sanitation SOP and prerequisite program records belong in the packet?
Does anything reach our inspector or FSIS during the test?

Rob Eason, founder
// Book a proof of concept call
Test it on lots that already shipped.
Thirty minutes with Rob: your plant and your role, the products you run, and roughly how many lots go out in a week. No sheet leaves your plant until the NDA is signed.
- Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
- Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
- 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
- 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
- Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
- Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.
