30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
Job 01 · HACCP records

// Meat and poultry processors · Pre-shipment review

HACCP pre-shipment review packets, assembled lot by lot for the person who signs.

The truck is booked and the lot's records are still on clipboards in four rooms. Someone trained has to gather them, read them against the plan, and date and sign the review before that product goes anywhere. In a free AI proof of concept, AI assembles the packet from copies of 20 to 30 lots you already shipped. Your reviewer, the person on your team who knows pre-shipment review best, compares each packet with the review your plant actually signed.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Shipped lots
20 to 30
Lots it approves
None
Records it signs
None

// The one job

A lot's sheets go in. An unsigned packet comes out.

A lot of smoked sausage or sliced deli meat leaves a long trail: batch sheets, cook and chill logs, metal detection checks, thermometer calibrations, a supervisor's direct observations, perhaps a corrective action from second shift. Different people keep those sheets in different rooms. Before anything ships, someone pulls them together, reads each one against the HACCP plan, chases whatever is blank and signs.

For the test, AI reads copies of those records for lots your team already shipped and assembles the review packet: lot and date, the plan and revision that applied, monitoring and verification sheets by critical control point, corrective action entries, and a list of every sheet missing, blank or outside the plan's stated limit. The reviewer, date and signature lines stay empty, and the packet never says a lot can ship.

Lot recordsSheets from several rooms
Product code
Production date
Cook and chill logs
Calibration entries
PointRecordedInitials
Illustration, not a real lot
Gathered by
critical control point
Review packetDraft, unsigned
Lot and date
Plan revision
Missing or blank
Outside plan limit
SheetStatusNote
Illustration, not a real review

// What makes it hard

What a signature on a pre-shipment review has to stand behind

The rule says what the review has to establish. Under 9 CFR 417.5(c), before a product ships the plant reviews the records of its production for completeness, including that every critical limit was met and that any corrective action was taken, with proper disposition of the product. Where practicable the reviewer did not make those records and is preferably someone trained under 417.7 or the responsible establishment official, defined as the person with overall authority on site or someone above them. That training has to include a segment on record review. So the packet lists whose initials appear on each sheet, and your reviewer sees at a glance whether the person about to sign also made an entry.

A sheet can be full and still fall short. Monitoring records carry the actual times, temperatures or other values the plan prescribes, along with instrument calibration, verification results and the product code, name or lot. Each entry is made when the event happens, with its date and time, and initialed or signed by the employee who made it. North Carolina's meat and poultry inspection program publishes a summary of the HACCP verification task that turns those duties into questions, and its step eight asks whether the final review was documented, signed and dated. The packet asks the same questions of every sheet: a value where the plan wants one, a time, initials. A check mark where the plan wants a number goes on the list.

Corrective action entries have parts. When a critical limit is missed, 9 CFR 417.3(a) expects the cause identified and eliminated, the critical control point back under control, measures against a repeat, and no injurious or adulterated product in commerce. If the plan names no action for that deviation, or a hazard nobody foresaw turns up, 417.3(b) adds segregating and holding the affected product, reviewing whether it can be distributed, and reassessment by a trained person. The packet sets each entry beside those parts and repeats what the entry says happened to the product. Whether the action was adequate stays with your HACCP person.

An open agency sample changes what the signature means. USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) said in its 2012 test-and-hold notice that completing pre-shipment review signals the plant takes full and final responsibility for applying its HACCP controls to that product, and that a plant which finishes the review with results pending, and then gets a positive, has shipped adulterated product. Product may move off site while results are pending only under the plant's own controls, with the review left incomplete and ownership unchanged, and FSIS treats a change of ownership as entry into commerce. A lot with an agency sample on its records goes to the top of the packet, with the sample noted and the review lines left open.

Neighboring records run on different clocks. Sanitation SOP records under 9 CFR 416.16 are daily, initialed and dated by the responsible employee, held at the plant for 48 hours after completion and kept at least six months. Where Listeria measures sit in a prerequisite program other than the Sanitation SOP, part 430 pulls that program and its results into the records 417.5 requires. HACCP monitoring records for refrigerated product stay at least one year; for frozen, preserved or shelf-stable product, at least two, and they may go off site after six months if they can come back within 24 hours of an FSIS request. Your reviewer, usually the HACCP coordinator or quality manager, watches for the right plan revision, lot codes that tie across sheets, and every blank caught. This describes public rules in general terms and is not legal or regulatory advice.

// What you send

Lots your plant already reviewed and shipped

Copies only
No live lot
01

20 to 30 shipped lots

Every sheet for each lot, as it came off the floor: monitoring, verification, calibration and corrective action entries. Include a lot with a deviation and one your reviewer had to send back for a missing entry.

02

The plans in force

The HACCP plan and revision that applied to each lot, with its flow chart and product list. A critical limit can only be checked against the plan of that day.

03

The reviews your team signed

The pre-shipment review for each lot, exactly as dated and signed, plus any written procedure for how your plant does it. Each draft gets compared with those.

04

Copies, after the NDA

The NDA comes before any sheet moves. No one signs in to your plant system or an inspection system. Records that can't leave the building become look-alikes built with your reviewer.

// Before it starts

Agreed before the first sheet is copied

The owner and your reviewer put these in writing.

Pre-shipment packet test termsOwner signs off
Your reviewer
Named by the owner, often the HACCP coordinator or quality manager
Success criteria
Written down: which sheets, blanks, limits and open items each packet must catch
Lots
Picked by your reviewer, across products and plans, with at least one deviation
Signature
Every review stays with your trained HACCP person
Price
A range for live packets, given before any record is shared
NDA
Signed first

// How the test is judged

The review your plant signed, beside each packet

Lot by lot
sheet by sheet
On the same 20 to 30 lotsThe review your team signedThe AI packet
Lot, product code and date tied across every sheetFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Right HACCP plan and revision for the productFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Sheets present for every critical control pointFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Blank fields, missing times and missing initials listedFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Recorded values set beside the plan's stated limitFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Corrective action entries read against each required partFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Open agency samples and held product at the topFilled in on your lotsFilled in on your lots
Not run yet. The table stays empty until lots from your own plant go through.Your reviewer marks both columns and makes the call.

// After a yes

About 30 days on lots as they finish

When your reviewer says yes against the success criteria, each new lot gets a packet the same way for about 30 days.

Your trained HACCP person reads every packet, dates it and signs it, and shipping waits for that signature exactly as it does today. What happens to any product stays their call.

The side-by-side check goes on during that month, and another job starts only if you decide on one.

// Later, one at a time

What could follow review packets

Ranked possibilities
Each priced alone
  1. 01

    Customer specification letters

    Supplier questionnaires and spec requests read into a draft response from your own documents, for your quality manager to send.

    Next
  2. 02

    Listeria hold-and-test lot files

    Food contact surface results, held lots and each lot's test or rework record pulled together by line and date.

    Then
  3. 03

    Annual reassessment files

    A year of deviations, plan changes and supporting documents gathered for the trained person who reassesses the plan.

    After that

// One hard limit

It never approves a lot or signs a record.

A packet lists what your records say and where they fall short. The proof of concept never touches your plant system, an inspection system or a live lot. It never approves a lot for shipment, decides a corrective action or a product's disposition, and never signs or initials a record. A trained HACCP person signs every pre-shipment review, and nothing here is legal or regulatory advice.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

Rob gives the range on the call, once he knows how many lots you ship in a week, how many HACCP plans they fall under, and whether your sheets are paper or electronic.

// Questions

Pre-shipment review questions

Will it tell us a lot is cleared to ship?
No. The packet shows each recorded value beside the plan's stated limit and lists what is missing. Clearing a lot, and deciding what happens to the product, stays with the trained person who signs.
We keep some records on paper and some in spreadsheets. Does that matter?
No. Send them the way they exist, as scans, photos or exports. The packet names the file each sheet came from, and anything it cannot read is listed for your reviewer rather than filled in.
What if the only trained person at our plant also filled in the sheets?
The packet lists whose initials are on each sheet, so that is visible. How your plant applies the rule's where-practicable language is for your responsible official to decide, and the test doesn't decide it.
Do Sanitation SOP and prerequisite program records belong in the packet?
Include them if your written procedure reviews them before shipping. The packet follows the procedure you send, and your reviewer confirms that it drew the line in the right place.
Does anything reach our inspector or FSIS during the test?
No. Packets come back to your reviewer and stop there. The test doesn't touch any inspection system and only uses copies of lots that have already shipped.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof of concept call

Test it on lots that already shipped.

Thirty minutes with Rob: your plant and your role, the products you run, and roughly how many lots go out in a week. No sheet leaves your plant until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.