30-min call with RobBook a proof-of-concept call
Job 02 · Project management

// Drywall and acoustical contractors · Rated wall submittals

Fire-rated assembly submittals, with every wall that has no listing or a mismatch set aside for your project manager.

After award, someone has to show that each rated wall on the drawings ties to a published assembly, and that the board, studs and joint systems you plan to buy are the ones that assembly names. In a free AI proof of concept, AI drafts that package from copies of 20 to 30 rated wall packages you already sent. Your reviewer, the project manager who knows those packages best, checks each draft against the submittal that went out and the marks that came back.

Book a proof-of-concept call30 minutes with Rob
Old packages
20 to 30
Ratings decided
None
Substitutions accepted
None

// The one job

From a line on the wall types sheet to a package your PM can check

Each rated wall on a project starts as a line on the wall types sheet, with a rating and a design number. Your project manager pulls the listing, reads what it names for studs, board, fasteners, tape and joints, gathers product data for what you plan to buy, and works out the joint systems. The package goes to the architect with a log of which wall uses which assembly, and it comes back with marks.

In the test, AI reads copies of your wall types, the listings and the product data you used, and drafts the package: each rated wall type with its rating, the listing number it cites, each item that listing names beside the product sheet that answers it, and the joint system at the head of that wall. Walls with no listing, listed items with no matching product and any mismatch go on a separate list for your project manager. Nothing is submitted, and nothing is decided.

Wall types and listingsInputs
Wall type
Rating
Listing no.
Head detail
ItemListing namesProduct sheet
Made-up example, no real listing shown
Drafted into
one package
Rated wall packageDraft
Wall type
Listing no.
Joint system
Open items
WallMatchQuestion
Made-up example package

// Where it gets hard

A listing is specific, and a wall type rarely quotes all of it

The listing names more than the wall type shows. A design in UL's public directory reads item by item: tracks and studs with a minimum thickness and a maximum spacing, board with its thickness, orientation and screw pattern, then tape, compound and any optional batts. An asterisk marks products that must carry UL's mark. The board item may name makers and type designations or point to boards eligible in other designs, and alternate items can change the fasteners. UL's published guidance says a design has to be followed as written except where an item is marked optional, and each design's header says to consult the authority having jurisdiction before construction. The draft sets each item beside the product sheet you supplied and shows where a sheet is silent.

One sheet can cite two designs. A 2025 Wyandotte County, Kansas, bid addendum cites one UL design for its A2 walls and another for every other A-series wall, and warns that fire and acoustic test references may vary with the manufacturer of the components actually used. BJC HealthCare's hospital standards go further and want complete reproductions of every UL design and its head and base joints on the sheets. GA-600 has file numbers of its own, so one package can cite two publishers. The draft carries each citation as written and marks any wall where the tag, the schedule and the listing don't agree.

Studs are where substitutions start. Notes published with UL's directory call the stud sizes in a design minimums, so a larger stud can replace the one named. Thinner is a different question. For design U465 the same notes set 25 gauge as the minimum for generic studs and runners, and say proprietary equivalent studs, which the industry calls EQ studs, may use thinner steel, must be evaluated for fire resistance and must carry UL's mark under their own framing category. A supplier quote that says EQ and a listing that names a gauge are two different statements. The draft sets what the listing names beside what the product sheet says and shows the gap, and your project manager takes it from there with the design team or authority having jurisdiction.

The top of the wall has its own listing. UL's directory numbers joint systems by type and movement: FF for floor to floor, WW for wall to wall, FW for floor to wall, HW for head of wall, BW for bottom of wall, then D for systems that allow movement and S for those that don't. The digits band the nominal joint width, so 0000 to 0999 means 2 inches or less, and the HW-D series moves to five digits after HW-D-0999. An April 2010 Walls & Ceilings article lists what to read first on a system: assembly rating, movement class, compression or extension, nominal joint width, L rating and revision date. It also warns that a system written for a standard wall may not cover a shaft wall. Where a rated wall meets a non-rated floor or roof, the International Firestop Council's table points to a different test, ASTM E2837. The draft ties each wall type to its joint system and lists every field the package leaves blank.

The field and the paper have to agree. Newport Beach's drywall checklist has every layer of a one-hour or two-hour wall inspected for fastener spacing, penetration and overlap, with fasteners on rated assemblies set by the design. The 2021 International Building Code calls for special inspection of fire-resistant joint systems in high-rise buildings and Risk Category III or IV buildings, among others, and ASTM E2393 is the standard practice for inspecting them on site. When nothing listed fits, the Council's 2024 guidelines say an engineering judgment shouldn't stand in for a tested system, should cover one job and location, and has to say plainly what it is. Your reviewer will look for the wrong listing on a wall, a product the listing doesn't name, a joint system with no wall behind it, and any sentence that sounds like a ruling. These rules are summarized for context only and are not code or legal advice.

// What you send

Packages your project managers already sent

Copies only
Listings as you used them
01

20 to 30 rated wall packages

Submittals you sent on offices, schools and hospitals, each with the architect's marks. Include one that came back for resubmittal and one with a head-of-wall system.

02

The wall types behind them

Wall type sheets, life safety plans, the sections that named the assemblies and every addendum, as issued.

03

The listings and product data you used

Prints of each design and joint system from the time, plus the sheets you submitted for studs, track, board, fasteners, tape, insulation and joint fill.

04

Copies, once the NDA is signed

No one signs in to your submittal log, project management system or a manufacturer's portal. Packages that can't leave the office get look-alikes, built with your reviewer.

// Before it starts

Written down before any package is shared

Each of these goes in writing first, signed off by the owner.

Submittal test termsOwner signs off
Your reviewer
Named by the owner, usually the project manager who sends these
Success criteria
In writing: walls found, items matched, mismatches raised
Listing source
The directory prints and manuals your team used at the time
Sample
Picked by your reviewer, with a returned package and a joint system
Who decides
Your project manager, with the design team or authority having jurisdiction
Price
A range for running it live, before day one
NDA
Signed ahead of any package

// How it's judged

Each draft next to the package you sent

Wall by wall
Item by item
Across the same 20 to 30 packagesThe package you sentThe AI draft
Every rated wall type, with its hour ratingFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Listing number each rated wall citesFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Studs and track against what the listing namesFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Board type and maker against the listingFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Fasteners, tape and insulation itemsFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Head-of-wall and joint system for each wallFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Walls with no listing, set aside for a personFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Mismatches your project manager or the architect caughtFilled from your packagesFilled from your packages
Empty for now. These cells stay blank until your own packages have run.Your project manager marks each one and makes the call.

// After a yes

About 30 days of new rated wall packages

Given your reviewer's yes, new rated wall packages get the same draft for about 30 days.

Your project manager reviews every package and decides every rated-assembly question before anything leaves, and anything unusual still goes to the design team or the authority having jurisdiction.

Drafts keep being compared with what you would have sent. Any further job is priced on its own.

// Possible next jobs

After rated wall submittals, if you want more

Ranked, not promised
Priced one at a time
  1. 01

    Partition schedule takeoffs

    Partition schedules and ceiling plans read into a draft quantity by wall type and ceiling type for your estimator.

    Next
  2. 02

    Rated wall inspection logs

    Foreman notes and photos filed by wall and layer, so each inspection hold point has a record.

    Then
  3. 03

    Above-ceiling marking lists

    Rated walls listed with the marking each project calls for, such as the 3-inch letters and 15 and 30 foot spacing in New York State's 2025 code.

    After that

// One hard limit

It never decides that a wall meets a rating.

The proof of concept works on copies of packages you already sent. It never touches your estimating, job cost or submittal system or a live bid or submittal, never decides that an assembly meets a rating or a substitution is acceptable, never signs or submits anything and never contacts an architect, inspector or manufacturer. Your project manager, with the design team or authority having jurisdiction, decides every rated-assembly question, and nothing on this page is legal, code or engineering advice. Certified payroll is out of scope.

Priced per job. You get a range before the proof of concept and a fixed price before you sign.

Rob sets the range on the call, from how many rated wall packages you send in a year and how many kinds of assembly a typical project uses.

// Questions

Rated wall submittal questions

Does the AI decide whether a wall meets its rating?
No. It shows the listing each wall cites and how your product data lines up with what that listing names. Whether an assembly meets a rating is for your project manager, the design team and the authority having jurisdiction.
What happens when a wall has no listing?
It goes on the open list with its tag, rating and sheet. The draft doesn't propose or invent a listing, and your project manager works it out with the design team.
Can it review a substitution, like equivalent studs or a different board?
It shows what the listing names, what the product sheet says and where they differ. It never says a substitution is acceptable. That call stays with your project manager and the design team or authority having jurisdiction.
Which directory does it use?
The ones in your files. The test reads the directory prints and manuals your team used on those jobs, so each draft is compared with what your project manager had at the time. Nothing is looked up in a live directory.
What about engineering judgments and manufacturer letters?
If they're in your sample, the draft lists each one with its issuer, date, job and the tested system it refers to, and never treats one as a listing. Whether one is accepted rests with the design team or the authority having jurisdiction.
Rob Eason

Rob Eason, founder

// Book a proof of concept call

Start with one rated wall package that came back with marks.

A half-hour call with Rob about your company, your role, the assemblies you submit most often and roughly how many packages you send in a year. Drawings, listings and packages stay in your office until the NDA is signed.

  • Co-owned a 60-employee financial services firm and sold his share to his partner.
  • Ran GOSO Technologies, a Boston solar company rated 5/5 across 24 Google reviews.
  • 5/5 across 83 reviews in HighLevel's Certified Admin Directory.
  • 4.3/5 from 6 Google reviews of Massmarket AI.
  • Every directory and Google review, critical ones included, is shown word for word at massmarket.ai/reviews.
  • Takes every proof-of-concept call himself.